2004
DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-40.4.632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serologic Survey for Selected Disease Agents in Wolves (Canis Lupus) From Alaska and the Yukon Territory, 1984–2000

Abstract: Wolves (Canis lupus) were captured in several geographic areas of Alaska (USA) and the Yukon Territory (Canada) during 1984-2000. Blood was collected from 1,122 animals. Sera were tested for antibodies against infectious canine hepatitis virus (ICH), canine distemper virus (CDV), canine parvovirus (CPV), Francisella tularensis, and serovars of Leptospira interrogans. Antibody prevalence for ICH was Ͼ84% for all areas. Area-specific prevalences of antibodies ranged from 12% to 70% for CPV, from 0% to 41% for CD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
29
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(27 reference statements)
3
29
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There were important and consistent effects of age and sex class on CPV and CDV antibody prevalence that were also similar to previous studies. As reported elsewhere, exposure to both CDV and CPV was higher in wolves .2 yr old (Zarnke et al, 2004;Sobrino et al, 2008). The fact that no pups or yearlings showed exposure to CDV, compared to CPV, is likely a function of the higher virulence of CDV and resultant high mortality among pups, which goes undetected in serologic tests (Almberg et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There were important and consistent effects of age and sex class on CPV and CDV antibody prevalence that were also similar to previous studies. As reported elsewhere, exposure to both CDV and CPV was higher in wolves .2 yr old (Zarnke et al, 2004;Sobrino et al, 2008). The fact that no pups or yearlings showed exposure to CDV, compared to CPV, is likely a function of the higher virulence of CDV and resultant high mortality among pups, which goes undetected in serologic tests (Almberg et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The fact that no pups or yearlings showed exposure to CDV, compared to CPV, is likely a function of the higher virulence of CDV and resultant high mortality among pups, which goes undetected in serologic tests (Almberg et al, 2009). We found weaker differences in exposure between males and females for both CPV and CDV compared to other studies (Zarnke et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations