2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological cross-sectional studies on salmonella incidence in eight European countries: no correlation with incidence of reported cases

Abstract: BackgroundPublished incidence rates of human salmonella infections are mostly based on numbers of stool culture-confirmed cases reported to public health surveillance. These cases constitute only a small fraction of all cases occurring in the community. The extent of underascertainment is influenced by health care seeking behaviour and sensitivity of surveillance systems, so that reported incidence rates from different countries are not comparable. We performed serological cross-sectional studies to compare in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possible source of infection could be the polluted water from the surrounding lagoon because animals have free access to this water, and a recent report describes the presence of another zoonotic bacterium, Leptospira interrogans, in resident Antillean manatees (Trichechus manatus) from the same landlocked lagoon (Aragón-Martínez et al 2014). Finally, the high pattern of Salmonella seroprevalence observed indicates an elevated proportion of subclinical infections in coatis and raccoons, a tendency previously demonstrated in human populations (Falkenhorst et al 2012). Thus, the presence of Salmonella in semi-urban wildlife could represent a serious threat to both humans and wildlife, and both sides of this issue need to be addressed: 1) Procyonids from this tourist park might represent a potential source of human infection because animals can act as asymptomatic carriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another possible source of infection could be the polluted water from the surrounding lagoon because animals have free access to this water, and a recent report describes the presence of another zoonotic bacterium, Leptospira interrogans, in resident Antillean manatees (Trichechus manatus) from the same landlocked lagoon (Aragón-Martínez et al 2014). Finally, the high pattern of Salmonella seroprevalence observed indicates an elevated proportion of subclinical infections in coatis and raccoons, a tendency previously demonstrated in human populations (Falkenhorst et al 2012). Thus, the presence of Salmonella in semi-urban wildlife could represent a serious threat to both humans and wildlife, and both sides of this issue need to be addressed: 1) Procyonids from this tourist park might represent a potential source of human infection because animals can act as asymptomatic carriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This estimation method has also been successfully tested in human populations to appraise and compare the prevalence and incidence of Salmonella (Falkenhorst et al 2012). However, it is important to corroborate this finding with other techniques such as molecular or isolation analyses, to verify the accuracy of the serodiagnosis for each species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore countryspecific MFs should be used if possible [14,64,65]. The MFs estimated in this paper are the only ones available based on Swedish data, and these are therefore considered to be the most accurate estimates available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The Salmonella assay detects human antibodies against S. enterica serovar Enteritidis and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium by a mix of serovar Enteritidis lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and serovar Typhimurium LPS. [21][22][23] The Yersinia assay detects human antibodies against Y. enterocolitica serogroup O:3. The ELISA uses LPS from Y. enterocolitica serogroup O:3 as the detecting antigen.…”
Section: Detection Of Antibodies To Enteric Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%