2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological detection and epidemiology of Neospora caninum and Cryptosporidium parvum antibodies in cattle in southern Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
21
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
21
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, it was (53%) among positive samples Table (2), these results were agreed with that recorded by (Dubey et al, 1998) where the prevalence of N. caninum antibodies were 68% and 20.43% in buffalo and cattle, respectively in the delta region in Egypt. Our results are higher than that reported by (Fereig et al, 2016), where they revealed that 18.9% of examined cattle were positive for N. caninum. Also, NC prevalence was high compared to other studies that had reported prevalence ranging from 1.9%-39.7% (Konnai et al, 2008;Asmare et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…In comparison, it was (53%) among positive samples Table (2), these results were agreed with that recorded by (Dubey et al, 1998) where the prevalence of N. caninum antibodies were 68% and 20.43% in buffalo and cattle, respectively in the delta region in Egypt. Our results are higher than that reported by (Fereig et al, 2016), where they revealed that 18.9% of examined cattle were positive for N. caninum. Also, NC prevalence was high compared to other studies that had reported prevalence ranging from 1.9%-39.7% (Konnai et al, 2008;Asmare et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…In animals, from 1999 to 2016 the prevalence rate of Cryptosporidium infection ranged between 2% and 69% among different species including cattle, buffalo calves, camels, sheep, goats, lambs, dogs, wild rats and quails. The highest prevalence rates were reported in governorates that located close to the River Nile [ 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 ]. In humans, between 1989 and 2016 Cryptosporidium infection has been reported in almost all Egyptian governorates with prevalence rates ranged between 3% and 50% or up to 91% in immunocompromised patients and diarrheic children [ 169 , 170 , 171 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 ].…”
Section: Parasitic Zoonosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, animal husbandry systems in Egypt, where most farms located near to rural areas of villages sus-tain the favorable environment for N. caninum, due to the presence of dogs with high numbers roaming freely around and enter the cattle farms and the lack of veterinary attention. The scarce researches on N. caninum in Egypt showed that it is endemic at moderate levels; 68%, in buffaloes (Dubey et al, 1998), 3.6% in camels (Hilali et al, 1998), 20.43% in cattle, 1.85% in rabbits and 7.92% in human in Northern Egypt (Ibrahim et al, 2009), 14.75% in chickens in Kafrelsheikh (Ibrahim et al, 2013), and 18.9% in cattle in southern Egypt (Fereig et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibodies in the serum of infected animal are very important for diagnosis of N. caninum infection, which could be detected by different serological tests, including: immunoblotting (IB), direct agglutination test (DAT), indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (Söndgen et al, 2001, Moraveji et al, 2012, Moore et al, 2014, Hamidinejat et al, 2015. Serological surveys for capturing sero-prevalence data are much required for control neosporosis (Fereig et al, 2016). Therefore, a sero-survey for N. caninum infection among cows that aborted in dairy herds may highlight the importance of the neglected role of such protozoan for abortion in Egyptian farms and withdraw the attention towards different causes of abortion other than brucellosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%