2016
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00142-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological Diagnosis of Chronic Chagas Disease: Is It Time for a Change?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
59
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
59
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As many as 284/307 (92.5%) confirmed chronic Chagas disease patients [29], this strategy could have saved 39 013 tests. Other authors from a different Spanish region proposed a similar algorithm with a slightly higher S/CO, but fewer reactive samples [18]. A multicenter study would be useful to unify these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As many as 284/307 (92.5%) confirmed chronic Chagas disease patients [29], this strategy could have saved 39 013 tests. Other authors from a different Spanish region proposed a similar algorithm with a slightly higher S/CO, but fewer reactive samples [18]. A multicenter study would be useful to unify these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors from a different Spanish region proposed a similar algorithm with a slightly higher S/CO, but fewer reactive samples . A multicenter study would be useful to unify these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New generation tests displaying potentially improved accuracy such as the Chemoluminescent Microparticle ImmunoAssay (CMIA) and its improved version, Architect Chagas (both from Abbott Laboratories, Wiesbaden, Germany) (Abras et al, 2016; Praast et al, 2011), or the Multi-cruzi test (InfYnity Biomarkers, Lyon, France) (Granjon et al, 2016) have been recently developed. Confirming the above mentioned trend, both use a large panel of T. cruzi antigens belonging to the 'parental repertoire' -those discovered in the 80's-, which in the case of the Multi-cruzi test is supplemented with TSSA (Trypomastigote Small Surface Antigen (Di Noia et al, 2002)).…”
Section: Diagnostic Applications For Chagas D Isease: Present Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confirming the above mentioned trend, both use a large panel of T. cruzi antigens belonging to the 'parental repertoire' -those discovered in the 80's-, which in the case of the Multi-cruzi test is supplemented with TSSA (Trypomastigote Small Surface Antigen (Di Noia et al, 2002)). Despite the virtual lack of antigen innovation, these tests incorporate a large degree of automation and highly sensitive detection systems (Abras et al, 2016) or major technical improvements, such as a multiplexed printing method inside ELISA microplates (Granjon et al, 2016). …”
Section: Diagnostic Applications For Chagas D Isease: Present Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, computational discovery using epitope repertoires from other infectious diseases enabled optimization of motif combinations to minimize cross-reactivity in non-Chagas sera. We discovered the motif [ADP]GGFG to be enriched in the epitope repertoires from specimens seropositive for either T. cruzi or Leishmania sp., (an organism known to generate false positive Chagas test results 23 ). Identification and removal of the shared epitope did not adversely affect diagnostic panel performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%