2005
DOI: 10.1128/cdli.12.1.152-156.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological Specificities of Murine Hybridoma Monoclonal Antibodies againstNeisseria meningitidisSerogroups B, C, Y, and W135 and Evaluation of Their Usefulness as Serogrouping Reagents by Indirect Whole-Cell Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serogroup determination by standard bacterial agglutination test (24) was performed with rabbit antisera against all 13 different serogroups (A, B, C, D, H, I, K, L, W135, X, Y, Z, and 29E). Isolates that were autoagglutinable or nongroupable were tested by an indirect whole-cell enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using specific monoclonal antibodies to the common serogroups of B, C, Y, and W135 (33). Serotyping and serosubtyping of meningococci were done by an indirect whole-cell ELISA (1) using monoclonal antibodies against the serotype antigens 1, 2a, 2b, 4, 14, and 15 and serosubtype antigens P1.1, P1.2, P1.4, P1.5, P1.6, P1.7, P1.9, P1.10, P1.12, P1.13, P1.14, P1.15, and P1.16 (Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, National Institute of Public Health, Bilthoven, The Netherlands).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serogroup determination by standard bacterial agglutination test (24) was performed with rabbit antisera against all 13 different serogroups (A, B, C, D, H, I, K, L, W135, X, Y, Z, and 29E). Isolates that were autoagglutinable or nongroupable were tested by an indirect whole-cell enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using specific monoclonal antibodies to the common serogroups of B, C, Y, and W135 (33). Serotyping and serosubtyping of meningococci were done by an indirect whole-cell ELISA (1) using monoclonal antibodies against the serotype antigens 1, 2a, 2b, 4, 14, and 15 and serosubtype antigens P1.1, P1.2, P1.4, P1.5, P1.6, P1.7, P1.9, P1.10, P1.12, P1.13, P1.14, P1.15, and P1.16 (Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, National Institute of Public Health, Bilthoven, The Netherlands).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, antibodies with binding site specificity for a small OS may functionally discriminate between simple haptens consisting of those OSs and a PS of multiple RU of the same OS (29). High-affinity immune recognition of the bacterial CPS, rather than smaller OS fragments, would lead to activation of immune effector mechanisms (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of immunological properties that might direct the immune response away from recognition of the sialic acid residues in each polysaccharide, it might be anticipated that sera induced by the two antigens would include populations of antibody that are highly cross-reactive and another population directed toward the surface containing C-4 of the hexose residue that would be highly specific. However, in reality in the case of the cross-reacting specificities, this is not significant, as serogrouping antisera produced in rabbits are typically used without cross-adsorption with related serogroups of meningococci (29).…”
Section: Structures Of Gymps Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although various methods, such as latex agglutination (25), coagglutination (32), the antiserum agar method (3), countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis (20), and monoclonal antibodies with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (37), have been proposed to improve the determination of the serotype and serogroup antigens, none has gained wide acceptance, possibly because either reliable reagents are not available commercially or the procedure is tedious or requires large volumes of antisera.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%