23 24 Author contributions: Jesica A. Herrick was responsible for the funding acquisition, 25 conceptualization of the study, study design and methodology, oversight of subject 26 enrollment and regulatory aspects of the study, data curation and formal analysis, and 27 writing of the manuscript. Monica Nordstrom, Patrick Maloney, and Miguel Rodriguez 28 were involved in the investigation and recruited and enrolled subjects in the study and 29 provided a critical review of the manuscript. Patrick Maloney was also responsible for 30 the formal statistical analyses. Kevin Naceanceno and Gloria Gallo Enamorado 31 performed the Multi-parallel real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) conducted on patient 32 stool samples as part of the investigation. Rojelio Mejia oversaw the qPCR conducted 33 on patient stool samples (supervisory role) and provided a critical review of the 34 manuscript. Ron Hershow was involved in a supervisory capacity in the study concept 35 and design, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing of the manuscript.36 37 Related manuscripts: All authors certify that there is no related or duplicate manuscript 38 under consideration for this work. 39 40 Attachments: STROBE statement 3 41 ABSTRACT 42 Background. Parasitic infections are likely under-recognized among immigrant 43 populations in the United States (US). We conducted a cross-sectional study to 44 evaluate the frequency of such infections among recent immigrants in Chicago and to 45 identify predictive factors for parasitic infections. 46 Methodology and principal findings. 133 recent immigrants were enrolled, filling out a 47 standardized questionnaire regarding medical history and exposures and providing 48 blood and stool samples for evaluation. Fifteen of 125 subjects (12%) who provided a 49 blood or stool sample for testing were found to have evidence of current or prior 50 infection with a pathogenic parasite, of which Toxocara spp. (8 subjects, 6.4%) and 51 Strongyloides stercoralis (5 subjects, 4%) were most commonly identified. Parasitic 52 infection was more likely among subjects who had immigrated within the previous 2 53 years and those with a self-reported history of ever having seen worms in the stool. 54 Infected individuals were likely to have multiple nonspecific physical complaints; 55 however, classic symptoms of parasitic infections (skin rashes, diarrhea, etc.) were not 56 increased among infected individuals. The most useful surrogate markers identified for 57 parasitic infections were an elevated Immunoglobulin E level (seen in 7/15 subjects with 58 parasitic infections, 46.7% and 22/110 uninfected individuals, 20%, p=0.04) and the 59 presence of Blastocystis hominis cysts on Ova & Parasite exam (detected in 5/13 60 subjects with parasitic infections who provided a stool sample, 38.5% and 5/98 61 uninfected subjects, 5.1%, p=0.002). In contrast, the Absolute Eosinophil Count 62 (typically thought of as an indicator of parasites) was not found to be a good screening 63 test for parasitic infections in this study. 4 64 C...