2012
DOI: 10.1016/s2222-1808(12)60098-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence of brucellosis in slaughterhouse workers in Kerman city, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a prevalence of 31.4%. Despite the difference in the methodology followed, this result is quite comparable to the one from the study performed in 2012 by Khalili among slaughterhouse workers from Iran which reported a prevalence of 58.6% [11]. In 2008 Pakistan reported a prevalence of 21.7% [12], the prevalence was also around 25.5% in India according to a study in 2011 [13] and 35% in Saudi Arabia in 2011 [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…We found a prevalence of 31.4%. Despite the difference in the methodology followed, this result is quite comparable to the one from the study performed in 2012 by Khalili among slaughterhouse workers from Iran which reported a prevalence of 58.6% [11]. In 2008 Pakistan reported a prevalence of 21.7% [12], the prevalence was also around 25.5% in India according to a study in 2011 [13] and 35% in Saudi Arabia in 2011 [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Among slaughterhouse personnel elsewhere, seroprevalence estimates of 59% (44/75) in Iran [118], 22% (78/360) in Pakistan [119] and as high as 39% (66/170) in Nigeria [120] have been documented. In India, 3.8% (42/1086) in veterinarians and 15% (8/186) in abattoir personnel have been recorded [121].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different similar studies were conducted among slaughterhouse workers and general population [ 2 , 4 , 22 – 27 ]. This rate was lower than those obtained from similar studies conducted on butchers and slaughterhouse workers from Khorasan Razavi province in the northeast of Iran (48%) [ 25 ], Kerman city in the south of Iran (58.6%) [ 4 ], Saudi Arabia (35%) [ 27 ], India (25.5%) [ 28 ], Pakistan (22%) and (21.7%) [ 29 , 30 ], and Tanzania (19.5%) [ 6 ] and was higher than what was reported from Brazil (4.2%) [ 31 ], and South Korea (0.8%) [ 32 ] ( Table 3 ). Collectively, these studies indicate that butchers and slaughterhouse workers might face different levels of risk to zoonotic infectious diseases in different areas, possibly due to variation in infection rates among animals, differences in human lifestyle and use of PPE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%