2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence of low rubella IgG antibody levels among antenatal women in England tested by NHS Blood and Transplant: 2004–2009. Is rubella susceptibility increasing?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
12
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies in other European countries reported similar data: the prevalence observed in Norway was 94.4% [23] and in England between 94.9% [24] and 97.4% [25]. In the United States, the prevalence was 91.5% [26], while in Canada the prevalence was 93.2% in Canadian-born mothers but was lower in immigrants from Northern Africa, the Middle East, China and the South Pacific [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent studies in other European countries reported similar data: the prevalence observed in Norway was 94.4% [23] and in England between 94.9% [24] and 97.4% [25]. In the United States, the prevalence was 91.5% [26], while in Canada the prevalence was 93.2% in Canadian-born mothers but was lower in immigrants from Northern Africa, the Middle East, China and the South Pacific [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Increased travel to and from countries with circulating rubella, combined with social interaction with populations presenting lower levels of rubella-specific antibodies, may give rise to local outbreaks when protection falls below 90% [25,35]. In the present study, immigrant pregnant women presented greater susceptibility to rubella (7.6%) compared to those born in Spain (4.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the IBD patients at our institution, we measured specific antibody levels for MMR, and varicella using EIA, which has a high sensitivity and high versatility. In the present study, seronegativity rates for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella were 32.5, 37.1, 32.0, and 5.1%, respectively, similar to the rates reported by Naganuma et al [5,6]. In addition, in a study on healthcare workers in major hospitals in Japan, in which seronegativity was defined as IgG < 4 IU/mL by the EIA method, the reported seronegativity rates were 7.4% for measles, 16.1% for mumps, 8.4% for rubella, and 0.8% for varicella [4,[7][8][9][10][11], and when we computed the seronegativity rates of our IBD patients using the same cutoff value, the rate was 3.0% for measles, 37.1% for mumps, 14.1% for rubella, and 5.1% for varicella, indicating higher seronegativity rates for healthcare workers in the general population were for IBD patients, with the exception of measles.…”
Section: Immunization Coverage In Japansupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the United Kingdom, rubella vaccination started in 1970 and in one study, the frequency of women with anti-rubella IgG < 10 IU/mL increased by 60% over the 6-year study period [22]. In a survey in 1997 from 45 developing countries, the proportion of women who remained susceptible to rubella was < 10% in 13 countries (including the Islamic Republic of Iran, Oman, Kuwait, China, Chile, Saudi Arabia and Gambia) and 10%-24% in 20 countries and ≥ 25% in 12 countries (including Thailand, India, Malaysia, Singapore and Panama) [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%