2006
DOI: 10.4314/bahpa.v54i1.32727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence of <i>Ehrlichia ruminantium</i> (heartwater) in small ruminants in a pastoral production system in Narok district, Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This information would have been valuable for developing disease control strategies. The observed overall seroprevalence of antibodies to E. ruminantium in this study is relatively higher than the 62% and 51.6% reported in sheep by Wesonga et al (2006) in Pastoral community area in Kenya and Faburay et al (2005) in Gambia, West Africa, respectively. Ahmadu et al (2004) in Zambia reported a goat seroprevalence of 40%, and in Zimbabwe a goat seroprevalence range of 67% to 100% on free range flocks was reported by Peter et al (2001) and Kakono et al (2003).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This information would have been valuable for developing disease control strategies. The observed overall seroprevalence of antibodies to E. ruminantium in this study is relatively higher than the 62% and 51.6% reported in sheep by Wesonga et al (2006) in Pastoral community area in Kenya and Faburay et al (2005) in Gambia, West Africa, respectively. Ahmadu et al (2004) in Zambia reported a goat seroprevalence of 40%, and in Zimbabwe a goat seroprevalence range of 67% to 100% on free range flocks was reported by Peter et al (2001) and Kakono et al (2003).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…This was similar to past finding, where sheep were found to be severely affected than goats (Njenga and Mugera 1989). Goats were reported to be commonly affected by peracute form of the disease but sheep usually suffer from an acute or chronic form (Njenga and Mugera 1989).The variation could also be attributed to differences in feeding habits of the two animal species where goats are mainly browsers while sheep are grazers and have wool to which ticks can easily attach compared to the hair of goats (Wesonga et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%