2013
DOI: 10.5455/vetworld.2013.1-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence of some bovine viral respiratory diseases among non vaccinated cattle in Saudi Arabia

Abstract: Aim: Four viral pathogens, bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), and bovine herpes virus type 1 (BHV-1), bovine parainfluenza type 3 virus (PI-3V), bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) are mainly associated with bovine respiratory diseases that cause major economic losses in the dairy cattle industry. This study aimed to document exposure of cattle in Saudi Arabia to infectious BVDV, BHV-1, PI-3V and BRSV viruses in non vaccinated cattle in order to obtain epidemiological and immunological information. Mate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
9
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result of direct ELISA test revealed high rate infection 30.23% that was indicate most cattle have been exposed to PI-3 infection and detection of the PI-3 virus in serum indicate that the disease was in viremic stage. These results were not in accordance with studies for detection of antibodies against PI-3 in Iran and Saudi Arabia by using indirect ELISA test that showed the seroprevalance of PIV-3 were 100% and 69.1%, respectively (18,19) and this may be due to presence of antibody against BPI-3 caused by previous infection and using of vaccine that may cause seroconversion for particular periods which may took months or years. High infection rate of PIV-3 recorded in this study is in agreement with the ubiquitous nature of the virus and with its worldwide distribution (20), may be because of no vaccines are used against this virus locally, and lack of control measures against this infection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Our result of direct ELISA test revealed high rate infection 30.23% that was indicate most cattle have been exposed to PI-3 infection and detection of the PI-3 virus in serum indicate that the disease was in viremic stage. These results were not in accordance with studies for detection of antibodies against PI-3 in Iran and Saudi Arabia by using indirect ELISA test that showed the seroprevalance of PIV-3 were 100% and 69.1%, respectively (18,19) and this may be due to presence of antibody against BPI-3 caused by previous infection and using of vaccine that may cause seroconversion for particular periods which may took months or years. High infection rate of PIV-3 recorded in this study is in agreement with the ubiquitous nature of the virus and with its worldwide distribution (20), may be because of no vaccines are used against this virus locally, and lack of control measures against this infection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…In this study, the overall prevalence of BRSV in the Nineveh Governorate was 83.11%; higher or lower prevalence was recorded in other countries. In Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Norway, the reported prevalence rates were 34-96.64% [14,15], 75.5% [16,17], 51.1-100% [18,19], and 54% [20], respectively. High variation in the prevalence estimates among cattle from different countries may be due to several factors such as differences in the disease management, laboratory methods, geographical region, and disease control programs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this was not observed in this study because the performance of the immunocastrated animals was similar to that of the non-castrated animals and superior to that of the castrated animals, most likely due to the increase in the serum testosterone concentration of the immunocastrated animals during the 85 days of confinement. The increase in serum testosterone concentration indicates that the vaccine was incapable of maintaining low testosterone levels in these animals during the experimental period, most likely due to a decrease in the production of anti-GnRH antibodies by some immunosuppressor effect, as cited by Yousef et al (2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%