2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2013.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella spiralis infections in wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have been carried out in recent years on the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in free-range and bred boar in many regions of the world, including Japan [42], the United States [27,28,30,43], Argentina [6], Brazil [44], China [45,46], and Korea [35,47]. Numerous studies have also been conducted in Europe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been carried out in recent years on the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in free-range and bred boar in many regions of the world, including Japan [42], the United States [27,28,30,43], Argentina [6], Brazil [44], China [45,46], and Korea [35,47]. Numerous studies have also been conducted in Europe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to infected cats by these women could lead to severe outcomes to her carried fetus. Many studies reported Toxoplasma infection in animals for human consumption (Bangoura et al, 2013; Hill and Dubey, 2013; Kang et al, 2013; Lopes et al, 2013), 12.2% of pregnant women who consume raw meat especially Malaysian who were graduate from primary school and Thai's who were in age group 20–29, single, graduate from tertiary education and in their first semester of pregnancy could be at risk for Toxoplasma infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, there is a lower prevalence (4.5%) of infection by T. gondii in farm animals (4.5%) (FORNAZARI et al, 2009). However, in southern Brazil, there is a higher prevalence (14.28%) of infection in feral animals (SANTOS et al, 2016), indicating that domestic animals (BAI et al, 2017) are less likely to be infected than wild animals (DEKSNE & KIRJUSINA, 2013;KANG et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%