2018
DOI: 10.1080/01461109.2018.1511155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serpent Mound in its Woodland Period Context: Second Rejoinder to Lepper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of wider interest, the findings presented here provide support for the notion of a continuity of belief in the Milky Way Path of Souls extending from the Mississippian period back more than one thousand years into the Early Woodland period (e.g. Romain 2005;2015a;2015b2019). Special thanks to William Iseminger and the Cahokia Mounds Historic Site for permission to reproduce Bill's wonderful painting of Cahokia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Of wider interest, the findings presented here provide support for the notion of a continuity of belief in the Milky Way Path of Souls extending from the Mississippian period back more than one thousand years into the Early Woodland period (e.g. Romain 2005;2015a;2015b2019). Special thanks to William Iseminger and the Cahokia Mounds Historic Site for permission to reproduce Bill's wonderful painting of Cahokia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Complicating the archaeoastronomic assessment of Serpent Mound is a debate regarding when the effigy was built. Multiple radiocarbon dates from the base of the effigy indicate that it was built c. 320 BC (OxCal 2-sigma 381-44 BC) (Herrmann et al 2014;Romain 2019). Contrary to this, others (Fletcher et al 1996;Lepper et al 2018) argue that Serpent Mound was built more than one thousand years later, by people of the Fort Ancient culture.…”
Section: Serpent Moundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serpent Mound is the preeminent effigy mound in North America yet the age of its original construction is the subject of on-going debate (Herrmann et al, 2014;Lepper, 2018Lepper, , 2020aLepper, , 2020bLepper et al, 2018Lepper et al, , 2019Monaghan and Herrmann, 2019;Romain, 2019;Romain et al, 2017;Romain and Herrmann, 2018). Attempts to obtain chronometric dates for the mound have, so far, yielded only terminus post quem dates, because none of the dated samples can be reliably linked to its original construction.…”
Section: Effigy Mounds Of the Ohio River Valleymentioning
confidence: 99%