2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00090-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
41
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…36 Further studies have demonstrated large SSLs with dysplasia are associated with increased risk of metachronous CRC. [37][38][39][40] Current guidelines consider SSLs of ≥10 mm or having dysplasia as high-risk lesions, requiring more intensive surveillance. 25,26 We observed a 1.5% prevalence of dysplasia in SSLs, much lower than previously reported.…”
Section: High-risk Polyp Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Further studies have demonstrated large SSLs with dysplasia are associated with increased risk of metachronous CRC. [37][38][39][40] Current guidelines consider SSLs of ≥10 mm or having dysplasia as high-risk lesions, requiring more intensive surveillance. 25,26 We observed a 1.5% prevalence of dysplasia in SSLs, much lower than previously reported.…”
Section: High-risk Polyp Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperplastic polyps (HPs) are still considered to be benign lesions with no risk of malignant transformation. The subtype mucin-poor hyperplastic polyp has been deleted leaving only microvascular and goblet cell-rich subtypes 100. Yet, the malignant potential of SSL is confirmed and may contribute significantly to PCCRCs 101.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) are rare but clearly also a precursor of malignancy. Both TSAs and SSLs may progress via the serrated pathway to CRC 100…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An additional driver for inclusion of the SSL detection rate among the quality indicators for colonoscopy has been recent evidence about an inverse relationship between the level of detection of proximal SSLs by individual endoscopists and the risk of post-colonoscopy CRC after having adjusted for the individual ADR 3 . It may be argued that again, the plausibility of this association is unclear, as the vast majority of SSLs are not dysplastic at the time of diagnosis and unlikely to progress to CRC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%