2022
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serrated Polyp Yield at Colonoscopy in Patients with Positive FIT, Positive mt-sDNA, and Colonoscopy Only: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry

Abstract: Background Stool-based screening with Fecal Immunochemical (FIT) or multi-target-stool DNA (mt-sDNA) tests is associated with increased colonoscopy polyp yield. Mt-sDNA includes methylated markers which improve detection of serrated polyps (SP) versus FIT. We compared SP detection in colonoscopies performed for positive FIT or mt-sDNA tests, as well as in colonoscopies without a preceding stool test, using the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry, a comprehensive statewide population-based registry. Methods Acro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…140 The multitarget stool DNA test is an advance in home-based alternatives because, with real-world adherence, it results in more life-years gained than fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) or high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing. 141 Multitarget stool DNA testing is also more sensitive than fecal immunochemical testing or colonoscopy alone for serrated polyps, 142 which are precursors for 15%-30% of all CRCs, including many interval cancers. 143,144 However, although the 3-year screening schedule for multitarget stool DNA testing may be less burdensome than annual testing, the cost remains substantially higher compared to other stool tests.…”
Section: Colorectal Cancer Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…140 The multitarget stool DNA test is an advance in home-based alternatives because, with real-world adherence, it results in more life-years gained than fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) or high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing. 141 Multitarget stool DNA testing is also more sensitive than fecal immunochemical testing or colonoscopy alone for serrated polyps, 142 which are precursors for 15%-30% of all CRCs, including many interval cancers. 143,144 However, although the 3-year screening schedule for multitarget stool DNA testing may be less burdensome than annual testing, the cost remains substantially higher compared to other stool tests.…”
Section: Colorectal Cancer Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous efforts to improve the detection of SSLs in the colon have included methods to examine methylation patterns in DNA (12)(13)(14)(15), chromoendoscopy with narrow band imaging (16), color enhancement (17,18), and novel artificial intelligence approaches (19). Despite these efforts, no single modality has gained acceptance due to cost and modest sensitivity (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%