1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00757.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum Carbohydrate‐Deficient Transferrin as a Marker of Alcohol Consumption in Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases

Abstract: We measured serum levels of carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT) in 420 subjects: 100 healthy blood donors, 82 healthy employees, 70 abstaining patients with different chronic nonalcoholic liver disease, 16 abstaining patients with alcoholic fatty liver, 50 abstaining patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis, 25 abusing patients with alcoholic fatty liver, 41 abusing patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis, and 36 patients with alcohol dependence syndrome with a daily ethanol consumption of 173 +/- 120 g th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…CDT seems to have a higher specificity; however, severe liver diseases or genetic D variants can influence CDT test results. Even though for this study patients with chronic liver diseases or using medications influencing liver enzymes were excluded, elevation of CDT or GGT levels might not be solely due to alcohol consumption [39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDT seems to have a higher specificity; however, severe liver diseases or genetic D variants can influence CDT test results. Even though for this study patients with chronic liver diseases or using medications influencing liver enzymes were excluded, elevation of CDT or GGT levels might not be solely due to alcohol consumption [39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while the degree of liver fibrosis did not correlate with elevated CDT levels, in that study few patients had advanced liver disease (cirrhosis) and only 10% were clinically affected by their liver disease (Stibler, 1987). In contrast, investigations of other specific populations have reported a high degree of variability in CDT depending on body iron (DeFeo, 1999), gender and exogenous estrogens (Stauber, 1996), and specific types of liver diseases (Murawaki, 1997;Bell, 1993, Stauber, 1995. For example, Heinemann found an unacceptable specificity rate (as low as 20 -50%) resulting in a high rate of false positives in patients with severe liver disease awaiting liver transplantation (Heinemann, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pretransplant abstinence does not reliably pre- Table 1 Efficacy of pretransplant CDT in comparison with posttransplant diagnosis of alcohol relapse. Sensitivity % = (2/ 2+2)x100=50%; sensitivity % = (7/7+33)~100=50% Compared with other biological markers the most important advantage of CDT was the independence from the severity of the liver disease [18]. According to this observation, CDT was identified as a very useful marker for the monitoring of an alcohol relapse in patients following OLT for alcoholic cirrhosis, as has been previously indicated [ 191.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%