2021
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.696085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum Complement C3 and C4 and COVID-19 Severity and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Meta-Regression

Abstract: Activation of the complement system has been observed in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression to investigate possible differences in the serum concentrations of two routinely measured complement components, C3 and C4, in COVID-19 patients with different severity and survival status. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, between January 2020 and February 2021, for studies reporting serum complement C3 and C4, measures of COVID-19 sev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
58
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of notice we see the most pronounced spreading/distribution in the moderate group. The findings agree with a recent study conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis, investigating possible differences in the serum concentrations of the complement components, C4 and C3, in COVID-19 patients with different severity and survival status (33). The conclusion was that both C4 and C3 levels were significantly lower in patients with high disease severity or non-survivor status than patients with low severity or survivor status, indicating that C4 and C3 are more readily consumed in patients with a severe or fatal course of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Of notice we see the most pronounced spreading/distribution in the moderate group. The findings agree with a recent study conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis, investigating possible differences in the serum concentrations of the complement components, C4 and C3, in COVID-19 patients with different severity and survival status (33). The conclusion was that both C4 and C3 levels were significantly lower in patients with high disease severity or non-survivor status than patients with low severity or survivor status, indicating that C4 and C3 are more readily consumed in patients with a severe or fatal course of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The levels of complement C4 were decreased from day 0 to day 10 in patients hospitalized for more than two weeks, but not in patients who were discharged earlier [41]. In a recent meta-analysis, a strong correlation between COVID-19 severity and mortality and C3 and C4 contents was found, which indicate reduced complement activation [42]. Furthermore, C3 and C4 may be helpful in identifying patients who are at high risk of negative clinical outcomes [42].…”
Section: Associations Of Biomarkers With Anti-sars-cov-2 Igg Antibodi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent meta-analysis, a strong correlation between COVID-19 severity and mortality and C3 and C4 contents was found, which indicate reduced complement activation [42]. Furthermore, C3 and C4 may be helpful in identifying patients who are at high risk of negative clinical outcomes [42]. However, in a previous analysis, no major variations in complement C3 or C4 levels were observed between severe and less severe COVID-19 study groups [43], whereas another report found increased C3 and C4 in COVID-19 patients [44].…”
Section: Associations Of Biomarkers With Anti-sars-cov-2 Igg Antibodi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 The larger viral load levels in critically ill patients could lead to a relative increase in the probability of transmission of 24% to 58% in household contacts, and of 15% to 39% in non-household contacts. [28] Contrary to low concentrations of serum C3 and C4, which indicate compliment activation [29] , the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab appears insignificant for predicting COVID-19 severity and prognosis[ 8 , 24 , 30 ], and may not be related to surface contamination. Last but not least, our study was performed before the pandemic of the Omicron (B1.1.529) variant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%