2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70233-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum DKK1 as a protein biomarker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-scale, multicentre study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

21
303
6
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
21
303
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, circulating DKK1 levels have previously been evaluated as biomarkers for cancer as well as coronary atherosclerosis. 71 In addition, the knowledge gained from these studies may also lead to the identification of potential routes for intervention in PVD, before the development of PAH and PH associated with chronic lung diseases, including IPF and COPD. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, circulating DKK1 levels have previously been evaluated as biomarkers for cancer as well as coronary atherosclerosis. 71 In addition, the knowledge gained from these studies may also lead to the identification of potential routes for intervention in PVD, before the development of PAH and PH associated with chronic lung diseases, including IPF and COPD. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the fifth and seventh cause of death from cancer in men and women, respectively (Shen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lung cancer, DKK1 was found to be a novel serologic and histochemical biomarker, as well as a therapeutic target (Yamabuki et al, 2007). Shen et al found DKK1 to be elevated in hepatocellular carcinoma, where it complemented measurement of AFP in the diagnosis of HCC (Shen et al, 2012). Kaba et al found that serum DKK-1 may represent a novel marker for bladder cancer determination and poor clinical outcome in Turkish patients (Kaba et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the 35 remaining full manuscripts were retrieved for detailed evaluation. Finally, 10 manuscripts in total (Yamabuki et al, 2007;Jiang et al, 2009;Sheng et al, 2009;Sato et al, 2010;Shen et al, 2010;Soydinc et al, 2011;Tung et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2012;Shen et al, 2012;Shi et al, 2013), which consisted of 11 studies, were included for evaluation according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The remaining 25 studies were excluded because of: a) lack of sufficient data (n=5); b) duplicate publications (n=12); c) lack of a control group (n=3); d) being a review article (n=2); or e) printed in Chinese (n=3).…”
Section: Eligible Articles For Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation