Abstract-Although renal transplantation improves survival, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remain significantly elevated compared with nonrenal populations. The negative impact of traditional, uremia-related, and transplantationrelated risk factors in this process remains, however, largely unexplored. Surrogate markers such as aortic stiffness and central wave reflections may lead to more accurate cardiovascular risk stratification, but outcome data in renal transplant recipients are scarce. We aimed to establish the prognostic significance of these markers for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events in renal transplant recipients. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, central augmentation pressure, and central augmentation index were measured in a cohort of 512 renal transplant recipients using the SphygmoCor system. After a mean follow-up of 5 years, 20 fatal and 75 nonfatal cardiovascular events were recorded. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, the area under the curve for predicting cardiovascular events was 0. Key Words: cardiovascular events Ⅲ mortality Ⅲ pulse wave velocity Ⅲ augmentation pressure Ⅲ augmentation index Ⅲ transplantation Ⅲ kidney A lthough the survival advantage offered by successful renal transplantation 1 in large part can be attributed to a long-term reduction of the cardiovascular (CV) disease progression and mortality, 2 the annual risk of CV death still remains Ϸ50-fold higher than in the general population. 3 Nevertheless, CV death rates in transplanted patients are reduced by approximately 75% compared with wait-listed patients remaining on dialysis. 4 This decrease in CV risk by partial restoration of kidney function can be offset by the emergence or worsening of other risk factors due to transplant-specific causes, such as acute rejection, infection, or side effects of immunosuppressive drugs, including newonset diabetes after transplantation (tacrolimus, steroids), dyslipidemia (calcineurin inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors), and anemia (mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors). Part of the CV risk after transplantation may also relate to irreversible vascular damage accrued during the pretransplantation period.These numerous potential risk factors, together with the small number of randomized trials, render the management of CV risk in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) particularly difficult, whereas this population represents one of the largest groups of patients with chronic kidney disease regularly seen by the nephrologist. Therefore, surrogate markers of arterial damage, such as aortic stiffness and central wave reflections, have gained increasing interest for the assessment of overall CV risk in this heterogeneous population. Patient and donor characteristics that have been related to measures of arterial stiffness or wave reflection include donor age, 5 graft function, 6,7 microinflammation, 7 new-onset diabetes after transplantation, 8 hypomagnesemia, 9 and use of cyclosporine. 10 However, these cross-sectional relationships are on...