Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen is a satisfactory surrogate marker of intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA in chronic hepatitis B

Self Cite

Summary The correlation between serum HBcrAg and HBV RNA is unclear, and correlations of intrahepatic cccDNA with HBcrAg, HBV RNA and HBsAg are rarely reported in the same cohort. This study aimed to assess the correlation of HBcrAg with HBV RNA and HBsAg, and investigate whether serum HBcrAg is superior to serum HBV RNA and HBsAg in reflecting intrahepatic HBV cccDNA in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative CHB patients. In this study, 85 HBeAg‐positive and 25 HBeAg‐negative patients who have never received antiviral therapy were included. Among HBeAg‐positive patients, HBcrAg was correlated positively with HBsAg (r = 0.564, P < 0.001) and HBV RNA (r = 0.445, P < 0.001), and HBV RNA was also correlated positively with HBsAg (r = 0.323, P = 0.003). Among HBeAg‐negative patients, no significant correlation was observed between HBcrAg, HBsAg and HBV RNA. By multivariable linear regression, HBcrAg (β = −0.563, P < 0.001), HBsAg (β = −0.328, P < 0.001) and HBV RNA (β = 0.180, P = 0.003) were all associated with cccDNA levels among HBeAg‐positive patients, but only serum HBcrAg was associated with cccDNA level (β = 0.774, P = 0.000) among HBeAg‐negative patients. HBcrAg was better correlated with cccDNA as compared to HBsAg and HBV RNA, irrespective of HBeAg status. Among HBeAg‐positive patients, though HBcrAg level was influenced by hepatic inflammatory activity and HBV DNA levels, the good correlations of HBcrAg with cccDNA persisted after stratification by inflammatory activity and HBV DNA levels. In conclusion, correlations of serum HBcrAg, HBV RNA and HBsAg levels differ significantly between HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients, but serum HbcrAg correlates with cccDNA levels better than HBV RNA and HBsAg, irrespective of HBeAg status.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Serum HBcrAg is better than HBV RNA and HBsAg in reflecting intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA

Chen

Wang

Tao

et al. 2019

Self Cite

“…HBcrAg consists of HBcAg, HBeAg and p22cr, the precore protein. Promising new data show that qHBcrAg is a reliable marker of viral replication and a good surrogate of intrahepatic HBV cccDNA . Further, different levels of qHBcrAg reflect distinct phases of infection, predict the CHB clinical complications and guide antiviral therapy management …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Serum hepatitis B core‐related antigen is an effective tool to categorize patients with HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B

Loggi

Vukotic

Conti

et al. 2019

Summary The discrimination between active chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and the clinically quiescent infection (CIB) is not always easy, as a significant portion of patients falls in a “grey” zone. Hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) is a now quantifiable serological marker with potential applications in diagnosis and therapy monitoring. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the HBcrAg serum levels in HBeAg‐negative HBV infection, and its ability in identifying the clinical profile, in comparison with HBsAg serum levels. HBcrAg was retrospectively assessed on serum samples from a population of treatment‐naive HBeAg‐negative patients by ChemiLuminescent Enzyme Immunoassay (CLEIA). HBsAg and HBV‐DNA data were collected. Serological data were associated to clinical profile, defined in the subsequent follow‐up of at least 1 year. In the overall population of 160 HBeAg‐negative patients, HBcrAg results weakly correlated with qHBsAg levels (Spearman r = 0.471, P < 0.0001) and correlated closely with HBV‐DNA (Spearman r = 0.746, P < 0.0001). HBcrAg levels were significantly higher in 85 CHB patients relative to 75 CIB carriers. A value of 2.5 logU/mL produced the optimal cut‐off to identify CIB patients, with diagnostic accuracy comparable to HBsAg levels. In long‐term clinical evaluation, a single measurement of HBcrAg at the established cut‐off was optimally consistent with clinical outcome. Conversely, the HBsAg cut‐off performed well in the true quiescent phase and less in more difficult‐to‐categorize patients. In conclusion, single‐point use of HBcrAg serum levels provides an accurate identification of CIB and represents a useful tool for patient classification.

“…It is now recognized that factors other than the quantity of cccDNA in infected hepatocytes, its transcriptional regulation, and the possibility that envelope proteins could be expressed from viral sequences integrated into the host genome also contribute to HBsAg levels . As HBcrAg may correlate with serum HBV DNA and intrahepatic cccDNA, as shown in patients treated with NA with a decline in intrahepatic cccDNA, it is possible that HBcrAg may better reflect the intrahepatic compartment than HBsAg …”

Section: Viral and Immune Aspects Of Therapymentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of currently licensed therapies on viral and immune responses in chronic hepatitis B: Considerations for future novel therapeutics

Gill

Kennedy

2018

Summary Despite the availability of a preventative vaccine, chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a global healthcare challenge with the risk of disease progression due to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although current treatment strategies, interferon and nucleos(t)ide analogues have contributed to reducing morbidity and mortality related to CHB, these therapies are limited in providing functional cure. The treatment paradigm in CHB is rapidly evolving with a number of new agents in the developmental pipeline. However, until novel agents with functional cure capability are available in the clinical setting, there is a pressing need to optimize currently licensed therapies. Here, we discuss current agents used alone and/or in combination strategies along with the impact of these therapies on viral and immune responses. Novel treatment strategies are outlined, and the potential role of current therapies in the employment of pipeline agents is discussed.