We read with interest the study by Bissonnette et al. (1) that was published recently in HEPATOLOGY. The authors attempted to fill the gap in noninvasive diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis in a prospective study. They demonstrate that circulating fragments of cytokeratin-18 (CK-18), especially the M65 component, had good diagnostic performance for estimating the presence of alcoholic hepatitis (AH) among patients with clinical suspicion in a test and validation cohort. This was particularly true in patients without recent bacterial infection. They also concluded that analyzing CK-18 fragment levels could help avoid transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) in two thirds of AH patients. CK-18 is not an exclusively validated biomarker for AH but is a direct marker of hepatocyte apoptosis and, as such, probably should not be considered a diagnostic tool. (2) High levels of CK-18 has been most validated in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (versus simple steatosis) (3) and toxinassociated steatohepatitis. (4) Obese alcoholics with AH could have components of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and AH working in tandem. The current study does not shed light on this matter, hence the proposal of CK-18 fragments in noninvasive diagnosis of AH should remain a research tool. With an overall incidence of infections approaching approximately 50% in AH, the noninvasive utility of CK-18 becomes superficial. Discriminating primary liver insults (e.g., druginduced liver injury) among heavy drinkers versus AH still requires a liver biopsy for clarity. In the current study, the authors state that the proposed upper limit cutoffs for CK-18 M65 fragments had a low negative predictive value and that the diagnostic performance was much lower in the validation cohort in which the results were not reproducible using the proposed algorithm, and most patients underwent TJLB. Currently, TJLB is no longer a "cry for the moon," and most liver units have the expertise to implement it. On the contrary, performing advanced laboratory testing for CK-18 fragments requires more prowess with regard to research personnel, equipment, and costs and is less available at many centers. Diagnosing AH relies on astute history taking-including attention to drug history, careful biochemical interpretation, and histopathology-to be certain in cases where multiple insults or a mimic of AH is expected. CJ. Serum cytokeratin 18 and cytokine elevations suggest a high prevalence of occupational liver disease in highly exposed elastomer/polymer workers.