Serum Metabolomics of Benign Essential Blepharospasm Using Liquid Chromatography and Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

Background. Benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) is a form of focal dystonia that causes excessive involuntary spasms of the eyelids. Currently, the pathogenesis of BEB remains unclear. This study is aimed at investigating the serum metabolites profiles in patients with BEB and healthy control and to identify the mechanism and biomarkers of this disease. Methods. 30 patients with BEB and 33 healthy controls were recruited for this study. We conducted the quantitative and nontargeted metabolomics analysis of the serum samples from 63 subjects by using liquid chromatography and Orbitrap mass spectrometry (LC-Orbitrap MS). Multivariate statistical analysis was performed to detect and identify different metabolites between the two groups. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the altered metabolites were performed. Results. A total of 134 metabolites were found and identified. The metabolites belonged to several metabolic pathways including phenylalanine metabolism, phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis, arginine biosynthesis, linoleic acid metabolism, tryptophan metabolism, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, sphingolipid metabolism, glycosphingolipid biosynthesis, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis, and vitamin B6 metabolism. Eight metabolites were identified as the potential biomarkers. Conclusions. These results demonstrated that serum metabolic profiling of BEB patients was significantly different from healthy controls based on LC-Orbitrap MS. Besides, metabolomics might provide useful information for a better understanding of BEB.

Retracted: Serum Metabolomics of Benign Essential Blepharospasm Using Liquid Chromatography and Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Manipulated or compromised peer review …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”