1984
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(84)90184-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum proteinase-like peptidase activities and proteinase inhibitors in women with breast disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, significant decrease of plasma A2M level in our study is in accordance with a previous study of prostate cancer [34]. However, the plasma level of A2M in other cancer patients can be varied, it can be increased [35] or unchanged [36] as well. Therefore, the value of A2M as cancer biomarker is still controversial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, significant decrease of plasma A2M level in our study is in accordance with a previous study of prostate cancer [34]. However, the plasma level of A2M in other cancer patients can be varied, it can be increased [35] or unchanged [36] as well. Therefore, the value of A2M as cancer biomarker is still controversial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Apart from CRC, various authors have found significantly elevated AAT serum levels in subjects with a range of cancers, including lung [25-30], liver [31,32], pancreas [33], prostate [34], cervix [35], ovary [36,37], breast [38], Hodgkin’s lymphoma [39], larynx and other head and neck carcinomas [40,41]. The data provided by these studies taken together suggest that the presence of elevated serum levels of AAT in patients with any of these types of carcinomas is related to an invasive growth of these tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been considerable interest in the diagnostic utility of total serum a2M measurements in various diseases. The concentration of native a,M in serum of cancer patients measured immunologically has been reported to be normal (Bartoloni et al, 1985;Marchandise et al, 1989;Gressner et a/., 1984), minimally increased (Vasishita et al, 1984;Millan et al, 1988), and decreased (Dabrowska et al, 1988;Bauman e t a / . , 1985;Ohtani et al, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%