2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum Proteomics and Plasma Fibulin-3 in Differentiation of Mesothelioma From Asbestos-Exposed Controls and Patients With Other Pleural Diseases

Abstract: Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is difficult to diagnose. An accurate blood biomarker could prompt specialist referral or be deployed in future screening. In earlier retrospective studies, SOMAscan proteomics (Somalogic, Boulder, CO) and fibulin-3 seemed highly accurate, but SOMAscan has not been validated prospectively and subsequent fibulin-3 data have been contradictory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have compared the expression of fibulin-3 against other candidate biomarkers in MPM, concluding that the detection of this protein alone may be insufficient to predict patient survival but can provide positive identification of MPM patients and could be useful for patient selection and stratification before treatment ( 55 57 ). It should be noted that fibulin-3 remains controversial as a biomarker ( 14 ), even though the original observations of circulating fibulin-3 in MPM patients in the US ( 13 ) have been validated in blinded fashion in population cohorts from Turkey ( 28 ), China ( 29 ) and Egypt ( 30 ). Accordingly, several meta-analyses have pointed out the value of fibulin-3 for positive identification of mesothelioma ( 31 33 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have compared the expression of fibulin-3 against other candidate biomarkers in MPM, concluding that the detection of this protein alone may be insufficient to predict patient survival but can provide positive identification of MPM patients and could be useful for patient selection and stratification before treatment ( 55 57 ). It should be noted that fibulin-3 remains controversial as a biomarker ( 14 ), even though the original observations of circulating fibulin-3 in MPM patients in the US ( 13 ) have been validated in blinded fashion in population cohorts from Turkey ( 28 ), China ( 29 ) and Egypt ( 30 ). Accordingly, several meta-analyses have pointed out the value of fibulin-3 for positive identification of mesothelioma ( 31 33 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fibulin-3 (gene EFEMP1 ) is an extracellular matrix (ECM) protein involved in organizing the ECM scaffold and promoting cell-ECM adhesion in normal connective tissues ( 11 , 12 ). Fibulin-3 is elevated in pleural effusions from MPM patients and has been used to distinguish these patients from normal individuals and from those who have non-malignant pleural inflammation ( 13 , 14 ). Comparative analysis of fibulin-3 and mesothelin has suggested that mesothelin correlates with MPM diagnosis more accurately than fibulin-3 but the latter could be a better prognostic factor ( 15 , 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By describing the variety of clinical phenotypes, it will provide insight into different disease pathways and outcomes. The repository of serial biological samples will provide a resource for exploring unanswered questions about blood and pleural biomarkers of diagnosis,28 prognostication29–34 and treatment response 35 36. Biological samples will also enable investigation into the pathological, immunological and genetic processes involved in disease evolution and progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cases were selected from two multicentre MPM biomarker studies, led by the senior author, that have recently completed recruitment (DIAPHRAGM, Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in the Rational Assessment of Mesothelioma 17 and PRISM, Prediction of Resistance to chemotherapy using Somatic Copy Number Variation in Mesothelioma 18 ). DIAPHRAGM prospectively recruited 649 patients at presentation for evaluation of diagnostic blood biomarkers, 152 of whom were diagnosed with MPM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%