Background: It is difficult to evaluate whether monitoring serum sFlt-1,
PlGF, or sFlt-1/PlGF in pregnant women who are suspected of having PE
can significantly shorten the PE diagnosis time. Objectives: To estimate
the accuracy of sFlt-1, PlGF and sFlt-1/PlGF in preeclampsia prediction.
Search Strategy: Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline,
CNKI, SinoMed, VIP Journal, and Wanfang Data were searched for eligible
studies published until October 7, 2020. Selection Criteria: The
research subjects were pregnant women with or without PE. The research
types were case-control studies and cohort studies. This was an original
study involving the detection of at least one of the following in the
blood, serum or plasma: sFlt-1, PlGF, and sFlt-1/PlGF. Data Collection
and Analysis: Meta-Disc 1.4 was employed, using the Sen, Spe, PLR, NLR,
and DOR to plot SROC, and subgroup analysis and meta-regression were
conducted. Main Results: Meta-analysis showed that for sFlt, PlGF and
sFlt-1/PlGF, the Sen was 0.811 (95% CI: 0.783-0.837), 0.735 (95% CI:
0.713–0.757), and 0.779 (95% CI: 0.763–0.795), respectively; the Spe
was 0.786 (95% CI: 0.769-0.802), 0.731 (95% CI: 0.721-0.741),and 0.885
(95% CI: 0.881-0.889), respectively. Conclusions: The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio
showed better predictive performance for preeclampsia than sFlt-1 or
PlGF alone. However, the predictive value of the latter two cannot be
ignored. Funding: Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region “Tianshan Innovation
Team Plan”(2020D14010) Keywords: gestational hypertension;
hypertension; meta-analysis; preeclampsia; predictive; PlGF; sFlt-1;
sFlt-1/ PlGF, systematic review