2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2011.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum Tumor Markers CEA, CYFRA21-1, and CA-125 Are Associated With Worse Prognosis In Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
143
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
143
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table II shows that the positive expression rates of CEA in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma were 42.9 and 73.3%, respectively. The level of CEA in the EBC and serum of adenocarcinoma patients was higher compared with that of squamous cell carcinoma patients: This finding is consistent with those described in other studies (19,21). This finding also revealed that the level of CEA in the EBC is valuable for the diagnosis of pathological lung cancer types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table II shows that the positive expression rates of CEA in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma were 42.9 and 73.3%, respectively. The level of CEA in the EBC and serum of adenocarcinoma patients was higher compared with that of squamous cell carcinoma patients: This finding is consistent with those described in other studies (19,21). This finding also revealed that the level of CEA in the EBC is valuable for the diagnosis of pathological lung cancer types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This analysis indicated that the levels of CEA in the EBC and serum of patients with lung cancer in stages III and IV were higher compared with those of patients with lung cancer in stages I and II (Table III). The level of CEA is likely to increase as the disease progresses (21), and this pattern revealed that the regular monitoring of EBC CEA may contribute to the assessment of lung cancer development. Regular monitoring may also serve as a guide for clinical treatments (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteomic analytical techniques (Yanagisawa et al 2003, Hassanein et al 2011 have been used in the study of lung cancer, and this has yielded protein biomarkers that have been demonstrated to have high specificity in a study of 54 individuals diagnosed with NSCLC (Zeng et al 2011). Serologic biomarkers of lung cancer have emerged recently: these include carcinoembryonic antigen, the cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA21-1, cancer antigen CA-125 (Cedres et al 2011), plasma kallikrein (Chee et al 2008), progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) (Wojcik et al 2008). However, there are relatively few studies of small molecule serological biomarkers of lung cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Wu et al (21) the mutation rate of the EGFR gene in women and men was 42.9 and 23.1%, respectively. In this study, the mutation rate in female patients was 68.42%, which was higher compared with that in male patients (37.5%), with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) (10,18,19,21). The degree of differentiation of the tumor was an important index for assessing malignant potential and prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Tumor markers are mainly used in clinical practice to locate the primary tumor, screen high-risk populations, identify and diagnose benign and malignant tumors, determine tumor development, observe and evaluate the efficacy of tumor treatment and predict the (8)(9)(10). The number of studies investigating the association of tumor markers with the EGFR gene is currently limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%