2009
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b3527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum tumour markers: how to order and interpret them

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
82
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The cut-off values were 35 U/mL for CA-125, 2.5 for CEA, 5 for hCG and 6 for AFP. 5 Serum CA-125 values were determined as normal lower than 35 U/mL and higher more than 35 U/mL. Other tumour markers were similarly evaluated normal or higher according to the cut-off values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cut-off values were 35 U/mL for CA-125, 2.5 for CEA, 5 for hCG and 6 for AFP. 5 Serum CA-125 values were determined as normal lower than 35 U/mL and higher more than 35 U/mL. Other tumour markers were similarly evaluated normal or higher according to the cut-off values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of course essential to be aware of the caveats of use of AFP, including the benign and malignant diseases that may cause raised serum AFP and the fact that a value within reference intervals never necessarily excludes malignancy (99,134 ). An elevated AFP detected by a single measurement may be transient (e.g., arising from an inflammatory flare of underlying chronic viral hepatitis), whereas elevated but stable concentrations decrease the likelihood that HCC is the causal agent.…”
Section: (512-515 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70 It is possible to measure serum CA125 in primary care; this has reasonable specificity, but the sensitivity is unknown, so it is of debatable value. [71][72] A better test is ultrasound, ideally trans-vaginally. This has been extensively tested in screening studies, with good performance characteristics, although -as always -it is risky to extrapolate from the screened population to the symptomatic population.…”
Section: Ovarian Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%