2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum uric acid and incident osteoporotic fractures in old people: The PRO.V.A study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, SUA levels have been directly associated with body mass index, which seems to be significantly associated with BMD values . Finally, higher SUA levels were found correlated with lower levels of bone resorption markers and 25OHD , but it emerged from some studies (also included in our meta‐analysis) that subjects with higher SUA levels have a worse renal function and higher serum PTH levels, two well‐known risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures. So further studies are needed to better clarify the confounding effect of these factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, SUA levels have been directly associated with body mass index, which seems to be significantly associated with BMD values . Finally, higher SUA levels were found correlated with lower levels of bone resorption markers and 25OHD , but it emerged from some studies (also included in our meta‐analysis) that subjects with higher SUA levels have a worse renal function and higher serum PTH levels, two well‐known risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures. So further studies are needed to better clarify the confounding effect of these factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The pooled adjusted HRs [median number of adjustments = 14 (range: 6–20)] for the number of new fractures during the follow‐up are given in Table . In the analysis on the both genders together, an increase of one SD in SUA levels corresponded to a 17% reduction in the number of new fractures during the follow‐up (three studies ; HR = 0·83; 95% CI: 0·74–0·92; P = 0·001; I 2 = 0%). The results for men alone were similar, while the estimates could not be computed for women alone (no studies available).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another longitudinal study of 16,078 Korean men aged 50 years or older suggested a similar association between sUA and incident osteoporotic fracture (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.70–0.99) . However, an Italian cohort study of 3099 men and women aged 65 years or older showed no association between sUA level and incident fracture risk . The differences across these studies may be, at least partly, related to different age and sex distributions of the study cohorts and the definitions of the fracture outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies found that higher serum urate (which is a major risk factor for gout) is associated with higher bone mineral density and a lower risk of fracture [10][11][12][13][14]; one recent study showed no relationship between serum urate and fracture rates in older people [21], another recent study found that higher urate was associated with higher fracture rates in men [22]. Gout, ascertained by any use of allopurinol in a large Danish registry, was associated with higher fracture rates in men but not women [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%