2015
DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03140315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum Uric Acid and Risk of CKD in Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract: Background and objective Serum uric acid may predict the onset and progression of kidney disease, but it is unclear whether uric acid is an independent risk factor for diabetic nephropathy. Our aim was to study the relationship between uric acid levels and the development of CKD components in patients with type 2 diabetes.Design, setting, participants, & measurements Longitudinal study of a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes from the database of the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists network. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
125
3
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
11
125
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As already reported [17][18][19], in Italy, diabetes care is mostly provided by a public network of about 700 diabetes clinics in which a team of specialists provides diagnostic confirmation, prevention and treatment for diabetes and its complications through close patients follow-up and regular checkups [17][18][19]. In the present study we selected a large cohort of patients with T2D followed up at 90 diabetes centers in Italy among those participating in the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD) initiative.…”
Section: Study Participantssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As already reported [17][18][19], in Italy, diabetes care is mostly provided by a public network of about 700 diabetes clinics in which a team of specialists provides diagnostic confirmation, prevention and treatment for diabetes and its complications through close patients follow-up and regular checkups [17][18][19]. In the present study we selected a large cohort of patients with T2D followed up at 90 diabetes centers in Italy among those participating in the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD) initiative.…”
Section: Study Participantssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Participating centers adopted the same software systems for everyday management of outpatients, whereas a specially developed software package allowed us to extract the information we intended to analyze from all the clinical databases (AMD Data File). Moreover, data from all participating centers were collected and centrally analyzed anonymously [17][18][19]. All patients gave their informed consent and internal approval was obtained by the AMD annals Scientific Committee.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results were consistent with previous findings, which registered that hyperuricemia seemed to be an independent risk factor for the development of incident CKD rather associated with overt nephropathy 37 and even in normalbuminuria patients with T2DM. 38 Collectively in the current study we, achieved that T2DM patients with UA ≤ 6.2 mg/dl were, younger, recently diabetic, better glycemic control, normotensive, lesser BMI, comparatively ideal TG/HDL-C, lower prevalence of early and overt nephropathy and preserved GFR. The current data give an important, highlighting to maintain SUA ≤ 6.2 mg/dl.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Occurrence rate of metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is increased as serum uric levels elevated [5]. Moreover, hyperuricemia was found to be associated with development of chronic kidney disease in subjects with type 2 DM [6]. In present retrospective analysis, we aimed to compare serum uric acid levels of well controlled type 2 diabetic subjects to those of poorly controlled type 2 DM patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, fasting plasma glucose of wellcontrolled type 2 diabetic patients (131±26 mg/dl) was significantly lower than poorly controlled subjects (225±19 mg/dl), (p<0.001). Similarly, HbA1c of well-controlled type 2 diabetic patients (6,8% [5,[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]4]) was significantly lower than poorly controlled diabetics (9,3% [7,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]5]), (p<0.001). Systolic (p=0.74) and diastolic (p=0.34) blood pressures were similar in well-controlled and poorly controlled diabetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%