Service delivery inequality in South African municipal areas: A new way to account for inter-jurisdictional differences

Abstract

Service delivery in South African municipal areas differs widely across jurisdictional boundaries. The paper illustrates the potential of geo-spatial mapping to quantify and map service delivery inequality at local municipal level in order to differentiate policy interventions. Data from a national 2007 South African survey were analysed to assess absolute levels and relative inequality of service delivery at district and local municipality levels. Not surprisingly, the results showed a wide variation in absolute service delivery levels when comparing richer urban districts to poorer rural ones. Service delivery inequality, however, was low in the richest urban districts, as well as the poorest rural ones. Conversely, service delivery inequality was highest in the more recently industrialised districts that contained both urban and rural municipalities. The scatter distribution of service delivery inequality versus absolute levels of service delivery appears to largely support Kuznets’ (1955) inverse U theory of inequality. Further analysis and discussion of the findings, however, illustrates that urban planners in both rich and poor South African municipalities are confronted with a number of dilemmas.

Bridging the urban–rural gap in facilitating Local Economic Development: The case study of uMgungundlovu District Municipality in KwaZulu–Natal, South Africa

“…Municipalities have not been able to create sustainable environments for business and partnerships ensuring inclusive localized LED. Sartorius and Sartorius (2016) argue that, since enactment of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of 2000), infrastructure development and service delivery in municipalities are biased towards municipalities with highest economic potential. Neglected municipalities with low potential are only mandated with minimal levels of basic services, thus becoming heavily reliant on grants and assistance.…”

Understanding the Living Conditions of Chinese Urban Neighborhoods through Social Infrastructure Configurations: The Case Study of Tianjin

“…In the last two decades, a great number of countries in Asia and Africa have experienced an unprecedented wave of urbanization, and hundreds of millions of people have moved from the countryside to cities [3]. Although the general economic and built environments improved substantially along with this process of urban growth, the living conditions of urban residents were unevenly affected [4,5]. Limited resources and large-scale migration often resulted in congregated distributions of social infrastructures, and offered unequal opportunities for different social and economic groups to enjoy services that bring about various patterns of life in cities.…”

Spatial Statistical Analyses to Assess the Spatial Extent and Concentration of Multidimensional Poverty in Gauteng Using the South African Multidimensional Poverty Index

“…Researchers such as Scott Orford (Orford, 2004) cautioned against failing to consider the spatial structure of neighbourhoods in the analysis of poverty. This may lead to the underestimation of the extent of poverty within an (urban) area (Sartorius and Sartorius, 2016). Exceptions include (David et al 2018) who employed spatial statistical methods to analyse poverty (SAMPI) at the municipal level.…”