1997
DOI: 10.17487/rfc2165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service Location Protocol

Abstract: Status of This Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When a broadcasted REGISTER message is received, it is stored in the local cache of the node, and when an INVITE message is received, the local proxy modules plays the role of binding between the specified address and SIP AOR. sSIP on the other hand depends on Service Location Protocol (SLP) [28]. In such a case, each node receiving the broadcasted SLP request replies back with SLP reply including its binding.…”
Section: Deployment Of Sip In Manetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a broadcasted REGISTER message is received, it is stored in the local cache of the node, and when an INVITE message is received, the local proxy modules plays the role of binding between the specified address and SIP AOR. sSIP on the other hand depends on Service Location Protocol (SLP) [28]. In such a case, each node receiving the broadcasted SLP request replies back with SLP reply including its binding.…”
Section: Deployment Of Sip In Manetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was created for client/server applications and it defines three kinds of agents: user, service and directory [91]. For more information, many of the protocols discussed in this chapter are compared and classified in [92] and [93].…”
Section: Service Location Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appendix: Changes to the Service Location Protocol from v1 to v2 SLP version 2 (SLPv2) corrects race conditions present in SLPv1 [22]. In addition, authentication has been reworked to provide more flexibility and protection (especially for DA Advertisements SLPv2 is incompatible in some respects with SLPv1.…”
Section: Security Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%