2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-021-02478-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service recommendation driven by a matrix factorization model and time series forecasting

Abstract: The rise of high-quality cloud services has made service recommendation a crucial research question. Quality of Service (QoS) is widely adopted to characterize the performance of services invoked by users. For this purpose, the QoS prediction of services constitutes a decisive tool to allow end-users to optimally choose high-quality cloud services aligned with their needs. The fact is that users only consume a few of the broad range of existing services. Thereby, perform a highaccurate service recommendation b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tang et al [19] used the network map to measure the network distance between service and users and identify the neighbors of users by considering the impact of the underlying network on the QoS of web services, and they introduced the above two factors into the matrix factorization as constraints for calculation. And Ngaffo et al [20] used a flexible matrix factorization technique and a QoS prediction of the future time interval using a time series forecasting approach based on an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model. But the latent vectors themselves made by MF are not explanatory, so Chang et al [21] introduced graph theory into the matrix factorization model to strengthen the interpretability and accuracy; this approach divides the user-service graph into a certain number of subgraphs by dividing the maximum subgraph, and then applies both the subgraph and the user-service graph to the matrix factorization model to perform local and global analysis and prediction.…”
Section: Collaborative Filtering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tang et al [19] used the network map to measure the network distance between service and users and identify the neighbors of users by considering the impact of the underlying network on the QoS of web services, and they introduced the above two factors into the matrix factorization as constraints for calculation. And Ngaffo et al [20] used a flexible matrix factorization technique and a QoS prediction of the future time interval using a time series forecasting approach based on an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model. But the latent vectors themselves made by MF are not explanatory, so Chang et al [21] introduced graph theory into the matrix factorization model to strengthen the interpretability and accuracy; this approach divides the user-service graph into a certain number of subgraphs by dividing the maximum subgraph, and then applies both the subgraph and the user-service graph to the matrix factorization model to perform local and global analysis and prediction.…”
Section: Collaborative Filtering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model-based CF algorithm uses all QoS values (global information) in the user-service matrix to construct a global model for QoS value prediction, which compensates for the above shortcomings [24]. For example, the method in Ref [25] performs both a QoS prediction of the current time interval using a flexible matrix factorization (MF) technique and a QoS prediction of the future time interval using a time series forecasting method based on an Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model. Dynamic relationships are frequently encountered in service computing related applications.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix factorization factor model is widely used. The matrix factor algorithm is used to extract hidden factors from the evaluation matrix of user objects, and these factors are used to describe users and entities, as well as users' estimated values of other entities [3]. Besides, Angadi et al discussed Naive Bayes model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%