Service user and care giver involvement in mental health system strengthening in Nepal: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitating factors

Abstract

BackgroundService user and caregiver involvement has become an increasingly common strategy to enhance mental health outcomes, and has been incorporated in the mental healthpolicies of many developed nations. However, this practice is non-existent or fragmented in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Instances of service user and caregiver involvement have been rising slowly in a few LMICs, but are rarely described in the literature. Very little is known about the context of user and caregiver participation in mental health system strengthening processes in a low-income, disaster- and conflict-affected state such as Nepal.MethodsThis study explores (a) the extent and experiences of service user and caregiver involvement in policy making, service planning, monitoring, and research in Nepal; (b) perceived barriers to such involvement; and (c) possible strategies to overcome barriers. Key Informant Interviews (n = 24) were conducted with service users and caregivers who were either affiliated to a mental health organization or receiving menta health care integrated within primary care. Purposive sampling was employed. Data collection was carried out in 2014 in Chitwan and Kathmandu districts of Nepal. Data analysis was carried out in NVivo10 using a framework approach.ResultsThe involvement of service users affiliated to mental health organizations in policy development was reported to be ‘tokenistic’. Involvement of caregivers was non-existent. Perceived barriers to greater involvement included lack of awareness, stigma and discrimination, poor economic conditions, the centralized health system, and lack of strong leadership and unity among user organizations. Increased focus on reducing public as well as self-stigma, improved policy frameworks and initiatives, and decentralization of care are some strategies that may facilitate service user and caregiver involvement.ConclusionThe study highlighted need for user and caregiver networks free from competing interests and priorities. Improved policy frameworks and decentralization of care may support meaningful service user and caregiver involvement.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13033-017-0139-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Making consultation meaningful: Insights from a case study of the South African mental health policy consultation process

“…The poor representation of mental healthcare service users at the national consultation summit confirms other studies demonstrating limited service-user participation in policy development in low-and middle-income countries [10,44,45], and in South Africa in particular [23,46]. This study, as in other studies [47,48], showed that service-user involvement in the consultation summit was limited and somewhat tokenistic.…”

Exploring the potential use of patient and public involvement to strengthen Indonesian mental health care for people with psychosis: A qualitative exploration of the views of service users and carers

“…17,18 Despite the ubiquity of involvement rhetoric within policy and practice ideologies across the world, current evidence suggests implementation remains far from optimal and service user and carer isolation and dissatisfaction persist. 10,[19][20][21][22][23][24] In a recent commentary, it was argued that true collaboration between people with mental health diagnoses and researchers, policy makers and health professionals cannot happen in environments which continue to perpetuate hierarchies and power imbalances albeit in a less transparent form. 25 Often such imbalances are sustained by macro-level factors such as the legacy of prior mental health policy and historical practice, legal frameworks and organizational cultures often not targeted or considered by PPI interventions.…”

Evaluating capacity-building for mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries for service users and caregivers, service planners and researchers

“…• Development and adaptation of 27 modules on mental health systems for integration within Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted at baseline to identify priority goals for service user and caregiver interventions and capacity-building needs (Samudre et al 2016;Abayneh et al 2017;Gurung et al 2017). Follow-up qualitative interviews are planned in order to explore perceptions of the impact of Emerald capacity-building upon service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening, the level of empowerment and mobilisation, the experience of participation in capacity-building, perceived limitations to the capacity-building approach and recommendations on how to improve capacity-building efforts.…”