Service users' experiences and views of support for decision‐making

Abstract

This article presents the findings from a qualitative, participatory research project which explored how people with intellectual disabilities and/or mental health problems have, or have not been, supported to make their own decisions. The aim of the research is to help inform how supported decision‐making, as required by Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, can be effectively operationalised. The project provides an overview of experiences of support as well as identifying which supports are valued. It was conducted between July 2017 and July 2018 and was a partnership between disabled people, service providers and a University. It involved peer researchers interviewing 41 people with mental health problems and/or intellectual disabilities, in community settings, about their experiences and views of support. The key findings include that decision‐making is a central aspect of people's lives. Participants discussed the positive role which decision‐making can have but also how it felt when they were not supported to make their own decisions. Participants said that there were three main things that make decision‐making harder: the type of decision; the role of other people; and what the outcome might be. Time was consistently identified as a very important factor. In terms of support, people said that they would like: practical support including more accessible information; emotional support including someone to talk to; and sometimes the options to choose from. There was very little mention of existing, more formal processes of support such as advance decisions or care planning. The peer researcher aspect of the project was valued by participants. The main implications of the research are for how support for decision‐making should be provided including the need for an individualised approach as the support needed varies across decisions, time and people.

Does the Effect of Customer Experience on Customer Satisfaction Create a Sustainable Competitive Advantage? A Comparative Study of Different Shopping Situations

“…Compared with consumers' attitudes toward products, the shopping environment plays a larger role in their decision of which shops they should visit [36]. Some researchers have maintained that store shopping affects the customers' expectations and perceptions, and their satisfaction in the end [37].…”

Key components of supporting and assessing decision making ability

“…One key objective of this study was to take a look at the key components of supporting and assessing the decision making ability of people with mental health and/or learning disabilities. In order to meet this objective, the data from a larger project which examined the experiences, approaches and preferences of people making decisions with support (Webb, Davidson, Edge et al, 2020) was re-analysed through the four main components of the capacity test. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University of Belfast.…”

“…This is sometimes referred to as the right to legal capacity and it is important to acknowledge that people can and should retain legal capacity, and their other rights, regardless of whether they have the relevant decision making ability or mental capacity. This paper will identify some of the key components of the support and assessment process and forms part of a larger project which examines the experiences, approaches and preferences of people making decisions with support (Webb, Davidson, Edge et al, 2020). This paper provides a more specific exploration of findings that may relate to the assessment of capacity and how that could inform the design, co-design and provision of support.…”

In the centre or caught in the middle? – Social workers’ and healthcare professionals’ views on user involvement in Coordinated Individual Plans in Sweden

“…None of these forms seem to relate directly to formalised care planning. Webb et al (2020) found little interest among users for formalised care planning and underlines instead the need for individualised, ongoing support for users in decision-making. In a study of user involvement about support in daily living for people with mental health problems, found that user involvement was an integral part of the service built on ongoing dialogue between the user and the professional helper.…”

“…Webb et al. (2020) found little interest among users for formalised care planning and underlines instead the need for individualised, ongoing support for users in decision‐making. In a study of user involvement about support in daily living for people with mental health problems, Matscheck et al.…”