Service workers and “difficult customers”: quality challenges at the front line

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the literature on service quality and value co-creation and co-destruction by unpacking the phenomenon described as “difficult customers”, which has many associated costs for service organizations. The paper examines how frontline service employees make sense of and react to client behaviors that disrupt service processes. Design/methodology/approach This is a qualitative study with 128 frontline workers, who were interviewed about their perceptions, explanations and reactions to problem-related customers, using a sensemaking perspective. Findings Content analysis revealed 17 themes related to workers' perceptions, explanations and reactions to problem-related customers. Workers classify behaviors of problem-related customers in terms exceeding the single notion of intentionality that dominates the literature, instead referring to the degree of both controllability and malevolence of customers. Service workers choose a wide range of behavioral reactions that have not been studied before. Research limitations/implications A convenience sample, although large, limits generalizability. Suggestions for future quantitative research are proposed. Practical implications Based on the findings, the authors suggest specific directions related to managerial policy and organizational practices related to training and employee empowerment and service recovery routines. Originality/value The study introduces a new theoretical notion of “problem-related customers”, set within a value co-creation context. It presents findings that enable deeper understanding of the emotional and behavioral reactions of frontline workers to service disruptions and offers multiple scholarly contributions, new research directions and managerial insights that can help to improve service recovery and service quality

Quality perception of accounting firm customers

“…Accounting firms, like other service providers, need to understand what influences customer satisfaction, that is, the customer’s assessment of the service received (Gal et al , 2021). Some authors have cited service quality as a driver of satisfaction and show it as an antecedent of customer satisfaction (Gounaris et al , 2007; Stein and Ramaseshan, 2015; Zeithaml et al , 1996).…”

The Managing Hotel Employees Achieving Wow!: A Conceptual Paper

“…Taken together, the coordinated application of sensemaking and sensegiving perspectives can enable service organizations to better cope with the complex emotional, cognitive, and decision burdens inherent in dealing with service recovery with customer-related issues. (Gal et al 2021).…”

Age, Gender, and Job Differences in Job Crafting Behaviour among Food and Beverage Employees of Five-star Hotels

“…Employees participate in job crafting to better the person-job fit between job features and their skills, requirements, and preferences due to the evolving nature of work (Tims et al, 2012). On the one hand, service staff frequently contact unpleasant and aggressive customers, and these encounters can have a detrimental effect on them (Gal et al, 2021;Lee, 2022). However, the quality of the service staff directly reflects the level of the entire business and the customer's subsequent service experience (Siddiqi, 2015).…”