1984
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1984)110:10(2424)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serviceability Limit States: Wind Induced Vibrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross-wind peak acceleration is reduced by 9.91% where the natural frequency is increased by 8.55% in the Y direction. These results are in accord with the fact that the level of the wind-induced vibration can be assumed to be inversely proportional to the natural frequency of the building (Tallin, Ellingwood 1984;Griffis 1993).…”
Section: Wind-induced Responsessupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cross-wind peak acceleration is reduced by 9.91% where the natural frequency is increased by 8.55% in the Y direction. These results are in accord with the fact that the level of the wind-induced vibration can be assumed to be inversely proportional to the natural frequency of the building (Tallin, Ellingwood 1984;Griffis 1993).…”
Section: Wind-induced Responsessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It is known that the level of the wind-induced vibration of a high-rise building with a natural frequency range of 0.1~1.0 Hz can be assumed to be inversely proportional to the natural frequency of the building (Tallin, Ellingwood 1984;Griffis 1993). Tallin and Ellingwood (1984), Chan and Chui (2006), and Chan et al (2009) have proven that the wind-induced response can be reduced by increasing the natural frequency of a building.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported the across‐wind responses of supertall buildings often exceed the along‐wind responses, and sometimes they can possibly reach several times of the along‐wind responses . And torsional responses may not be ignored in serviceability design of skyscrapers, as the habitants are more sensitive to torsional motion than translational motion in some cases . Kareem pointed out that the torsional motion may even be further amplified in asymmetric buildings as a result of inertial coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…acceleration and jerk, is quite significant. Considering also that in a tall building the occupants are more sensitive to torsional motion than translation motion (Tallin and Ellingwood, 1984), their comfort can be affected by an underestimation of the dynamic response if the higher modes of vibration are neglected (Huang and Chen, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%