2010
DOI: 10.21236/ada538770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Services Supply Chain in the Department of Defense: A Comparison of Acquisition Management Practices in the Army, Navy, and Air Force

Abstract: =^Å èìáëáíáçå=oÉëÉ~êÅÜ=mêçÖê~ã= do^ar^qb=p`elli=lc=_rpfkbpp=C=mr_if`=mlif`v= k^s^i=mlpqdo^ar^qb=p`elli= Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of survey data indicated that the current state of services acquisition management suffers from several deficiencies, including deficit billet and manning levels (which are further aggravated by insufficient training and the inexperience of acquisition personnel) and the lack of strong project-team and life-cycle approaches. Our research (Apte, Apte, & Rendon, 2010) also analyzed and compared the results of the primary data collected in two previous empirical studies involving Army, Navy, and Air Force contracting organizations so as to develop a more thorough and comprehensive understanding of how services acquisition is being managed within individual military Services.…”
Section: Literature Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of survey data indicated that the current state of services acquisition management suffers from several deficiencies, including deficit billet and manning levels (which are further aggravated by insufficient training and the inexperience of acquisition personnel) and the lack of strong project-team and life-cycle approaches. Our research (Apte, Apte, & Rendon, 2010) also analyzed and compared the results of the primary data collected in two previous empirical studies involving Army, Navy, and Air Force contracting organizations so as to develop a more thorough and comprehensive understanding of how services acquisition is being managed within individual military Services.…”
Section: Literature Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy to mention that each military department should implement these recommendations at varying degrees, as shown in research conducted by Apte, Apte, and Rendon (2010).…”
Section: Gao Service Contract Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of a project life cycle raises concerns because it creates a higher degree of cost, schedule, and performance risk in the military department that handles the majority of the DoD's services spending (Apte, Apte, et al, 2010). (Apte, Apte, et al, 2010) The Navy is the second largest spender of the DoD's services contract dollars (see Figure 2). The Navy operates very differently than the Army or Air…”
Section: Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations