This article analyses the imagined threat posed by the Islamic State in the aftermath of the November 13 th Paris attacks and during the build-up to the December 2 nd 2015 House of Commons vote to extend U.K. airstrikes to Syria. Drawing together Political Communications and International Relations approaches to framing analysis, and focusing on Britain's three main television news providers (BBC, ITV and Channel 4), it questions (1) how is the Islamic State is framed for U.K audiences, (2) who shapes those frames, and ( 3) what consequences arise from adopting certain frames over others? The analysis identifies three competing representational frames (labelled here as the "(Para)Military", the "Elusive" and the "Extremist" frames), and their main advocates, and shows how, ultimately, U.K. news media tend to support an "elite"centred framing of the threat, via its foregrounding of the "(Para)Military" and "Extremist" frames, thus legitimising calls for extending airstrikes into Syria. In so doing, the article provides two contributions to knowledge: first, empirical, by generating substantive new insight into the way the Islamic State was portrayed in the days and weeks following the Paris attacks, and in particular who shapes such frames; and, second, conceptual, via its blending of Political Communications and International Relations approaches to framing and their consequences.