Serving the Vulnerable: The World Health Organization's Scaled Support to Countries During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

The Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC), created by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly in 1991, serves as the global humanitarian coordination forum of the UN s system. The IASC brings 18 agencies together, including the World Health Organization (WHO), for humanitarian preparedness and response policies and action. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, the IASC recognized the importance of providing intensified support to countries with conflict, humanitarian, or complex emergencies due to their weak health systems and fragile contexts. A Global Humanitarian Response Plan (GHRP) was rapidly developed in March 2020, which reflected the international support needed for 63 target countries deemed to have humanitarian vulnerability. This paper assessed whether WHO provided intensified technical, financial, and commodity inputs to GHRP countries (n = 63) compared to non-GHRP countries (n = 131) in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis showed that WHO supported all 194 countries regardless of humanitarian vulnerability. Health commodities were supplied to most countries globally (86%), and WHO implemented most (67%) of the $1.268 billion spent in 2020 at country level. However, proportionally more GHRP countries received health commodities and nearly four times as much was spent in GHRP countries per capita compared to non-GHRP countries ($232 vs. $60 per 1,000 capita). In countries with WHO country offices (n = 149), proportionally more GHRP countries received WHO support for developing national response plans and monitoring frameworks, training of technical staff, facilitating logistics, publication of situation updates, and participation in research activities prior to the characterization of the pandemic or first in-country COVID-19 case. This affirms WHO's capacity to scale country support according to its humanitarian mandate. Further work is needed to assess the impact of WHO's inputs on health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic, which will strengthen WHO's scaled support to countries during future health emergencies.

Pandemics past: Collective memories for a global community?

“…Most of these recommendations have already been put in place by the International Health Regulations (2005) agreement of the World Health Organization (WHO, 2021), yet reviews found that many countries do not fully meet pandemic preparedness requirements. Consequently, recent recommendations included increasing the authority and funding of the WHO (Duff et al, 2021; Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, 2021), and the participation of countries in the efforts of WHO and United Nations since these organizations coordinate responses to humanitarian crises, and to pandemics specifically (Bajard et al, 2022; Brown & Susskind, 2020). Finally, because of increasing evidence that links environmental and climate change to emerging infectious diseases with pandemic potential (i.e., changes in patterns of human–nonhuman animal interactions giving way to zoonotic spillover of pathogens; C.…”

The World Health Organization's Frontline Support to Countries During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020

“…At the country level, the minimum requirements for delivery of these COVID-19 tools was mapped in four of six WHO regions and 105 countries surveyed to identify potential bottlenecks and capacity gaps to inform planning and deployment (35). In 2020, WHO procured and supplied critical COVID-19 health commodities for 167 (86%) of its Member States (29), which included 16 thousand oxygen concentrators, 40 thousand oxygen monitors (5) as well as 200 million masks and millions more personal protective equipment (36) and by February 24, 2021, COVAX, the vaccines pillar of the ACT Accelerator commenced deployment of COVID-19 vaccines to participating economies (37).…”