2016
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20160708011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SESAME: Exploring small businesses’ behaviour to enhance resilience to flooding

Abstract: Abstract. In the United Kingdom, small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) account for approximately 99.9% of businesses, 60% of the working population and 47% annual turnover. However, despite the important contribution that SMEs make to the economy, this size of business remains under-researched with a significant gap in understanding how the disruption caused by flooding impacts on SMEs from the time at which a flood event occurs through to the µUHWXUQ ¶ WR QRUPDO RSHUDWLRQV. Business continuity management … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation based approaches typically involved using hydraulic modelling software to simulate flood events as a means of analysing system performance (see Birgani and Yazdandoost 2016;Owotoki et al 2006;Mugume et al 2015;Schinke et al 2016;Golz, Schinke, and Naumann 2015;Pregnolato et al 2016;Gersonius et al 2008). Alternatively, Coates et al (2016) and Song, Huang, and Li (2017) use other simulation methods, such as Agent-Based Modelling and Change Detection Analysis, respectively. The indicator methods used are all similar in principle; however they are applied differently and can be easily tailored to different contexts and hazards across geographical boundaries.…”
Section: Quantitative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation based approaches typically involved using hydraulic modelling software to simulate flood events as a means of analysing system performance (see Birgani and Yazdandoost 2016;Owotoki et al 2006;Mugume et al 2015;Schinke et al 2016;Golz, Schinke, and Naumann 2015;Pregnolato et al 2016;Gersonius et al 2008). Alternatively, Coates et al (2016) and Song, Huang, and Li (2017) use other simulation methods, such as Agent-Based Modelling and Change Detection Analysis, respectively. The indicator methods used are all similar in principle; however they are applied differently and can be easily tailored to different contexts and hazards across geographical boundaries.…”
Section: Quantitative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative approaches for assessing flood resilience are commonly based on indicators or simulations which evaluate system performances, during or in the immediate aftermath of the event, starting from flood models (Coates et al, 2016; Pregnolato et al, 2016; Schinke et al, 2016). However, conceptual and theoretical frameworks are more popular and highlight difficulties in operationalizing resilience (McClymont et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%