2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-2979-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SESOTHO trial (“Switch Either near Suppression Or THOusand”) – switch to second-line versus WHO-guided standard of care for unsuppressed patients on first-line ART with viremia below 1000 copies/mL: protocol of a multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, randomized clinical trial in Lesotho, Southern Africa

Abstract: BackgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends viral load (VL) measurement as the preferred monitoring strategy for HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings. The new WHO guidelines 2016 continue to define virologic failure as two consecutive VL ≥1000 copies/mL (at least 3 months apart) despite good adherence, triggering switch to second-line therapy. However, the threshold of 1000 copies/mL for defining virologic failure is based on low-quality evidence. O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly the WHO recognizes that this threshold has not been proven to be optimal for detecting treatment failure [27]. Various studies have proven that this threshold significantly misclassifies patients and undermines the large subset of patients who require clinical intervention [28, 29]. In this particular study 24(7.5%) of the patients had detectable viral load (≥ 150 copies /ml) but have not been given attention regarding this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly the WHO recognizes that this threshold has not been proven to be optimal for detecting treatment failure [27]. Various studies have proven that this threshold significantly misclassifies patients and undermines the large subset of patients who require clinical intervention [28, 29]. In this particular study 24(7.5%) of the patients had detectable viral load (≥ 150 copies /ml) but have not been given attention regarding this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recruitment lasted from August 1, 2017, until August 7, 2019, when the target sample size was achieved. A detailed study protocol has been published previously [ 21 ]. Eligible participants were individuals living with HIV, taking non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based first-line ART (standard first-line regimen in most resource-limited countries at that time) for at least six mo, presenting two consecutive VLs ≥100 copies/mL with the second VL between 100 and 999 copies/mL, and providing written informed consent to participate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of our sample size calculation have been published previously [ 21 ]. Assuming a two-sided type-1 error of 5% and a power of 90%, 80 individuals (40 per group) were needed to detect a 35% difference in viral suppression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIV viral load was measured in the Sichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Virological failure in ART was defined as HIV RNA level ≥ 1000 copies/ml [20,21] after receiving ART for more than 6 months.…”
Section: Laboratory Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%