2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41526-020-00128-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sessile volatile drop evaporation under microgravity

Abstract: The evaporation of sessile drops of various volatile and non-volatile liquids, and their internal flow patterns with or without instabilities have been the subject of many investigations. The current experiment is a preparatory one for a space experiment planned to be installed in the European Drawer Rack 2 (EDR-2) of the International Space Station (ISS), to investigate drop evaporation in weightlessness. In this work, we concentrate on preliminary experimental results for the evaporation of hydrofluoroether … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected evaporation under microgravity is lower than terrestrial gravity [33,34] and the deviation continue to increase with the drop liquid volatility and substrate temperature as observed in the case of Ethanol and HFE7100. Also, the comparison of the average of the evaporation rate in microgravity (numerical) and terrestrial gravity (experiments) for water at substrate temperature 𝑇 = 313 K, evaporation rate under microgravity is 8.85% lower than the under terrestrial gravity condition but difference increase further up to 18.14% at 𝑇 = 343 K [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected evaporation under microgravity is lower than terrestrial gravity [33,34] and the deviation continue to increase with the drop liquid volatility and substrate temperature as observed in the case of Ethanol and HFE7100. Also, the comparison of the average of the evaporation rate in microgravity (numerical) and terrestrial gravity (experiments) for water at substrate temperature 𝑇 = 313 K, evaporation rate under microgravity is 8.85% lower than the under terrestrial gravity condition but difference increase further up to 18.14% at 𝑇 = 343 K [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…As some diffusion models (mostly one-way coupled [8,10,11,15,38,39,40]) also considered evaporation of sessile drop under saturated vapour pressure with gravity. However under same conditions the evaporation rate under gravity is higher compared to microgravity [34,37]. In gravity, natural convection influence (reduces) the vapour pressure, so vapour pressure should be not be considered equal to saturated vapour pressure.…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The good agreement with the Stokes results for narrow gaps for small or moderate contact angles indicates that the developed thin-film model can be used as a valid tool for the study of shallow sessile drops of volatile liquids in a variety of contexts across all dynamical regimes. The model can easily be adapted for many closely related systems, e.g., incorporating chemically or topographically heterogeneous substrates, resulting in contact line pinning and depinning (van Der Heijden et al 2018), adding gravity or other body forces (Kumar et al 2020), or considering the importance of the evaporation regime in dip coating (Bindini et al 2017;Dey et al 2016). As the presented thin-film description is of gradient dynamics form, necessary changes can often be incorporated via adapting the underlying free energy functional that here only incorporates wetting, interface and bulk energies of the liquid and vapour entropy [cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new macroscopic mechanical model was derived to compute the shape of weightless sessile drops in static equilibrium. Our initial motivation was to understand more clearly the repeatability issues encountered while creating sessile drops in weightlessness by injecting liquid through a small hole in a substrate 21 , 22 . The derived model is based on the classical Young–Laplace equation, Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%