2009
DOI: 10.37236/231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set Families with a Forbidden Subposet

Abstract: We asymptotically determine the size of the largest family F of subsets of {1, . . . , n} not containing a given poset P if the Hasse diagram of P is a tree. This is a qualitative generalization of several known results including Sperner's theorem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
106
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A remarkable result concerning Conjecture 1.1 is that of Bukh [2], who verified Conjecture 1.1 (i) for tree posets. In the following results we strengthen his result in two cases.…”
Section: Asymptotic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A remarkable result concerning Conjecture 1.1 is that of Bukh [2], who verified Conjecture 1.1 (i) for tree posets. In the following results we strengthen his result in two cases.…”
Section: Asymptotic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The proof of Theorem 1.2 follows the lines of a reasoning of Bukh's [2]. The new idea is that we count the number of related pairs between two fixed levels as detailed in the proof below.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 12: Trees Of Height Twomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let I i 1 be the family of light elements of [k/s i ] d , I i 2 be the family of fat elements, and I i 3 be the family of medium elements. Also, for j ∈ [3],…”
Section: Finding P In Sparse Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of La(n, P ) was also studied for a number of fixed posets such as forks and brooms [7,19,28], diamond [14,22], butterfly [8], cycles C 4k on two levels [15]. In case the Hasse diagram of P is a tree, it was proved by Bukh [3] that La(n, P ) < (h − 1 + o(1)) n ⌊n/2⌋ , where h is the height of P , and Boehnlein and Jiang [2] improved this result by showing that La # (n, P ) < (h − 1 + o(1)) n ⌊n/2⌋ also holds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A poset is called a tree poset if its Hasse diagram is a tree. Bukh [1] generalized Theorem 1.2 to all tree posets by showing that for any tree poset T of height h(T ), we have La(n, T ) = (h(T ) − 1 + o(1)) n ⌊ n 2 ⌋ . Recently Gerbner, Keszegh and Patkós [3] initiated the investigation of counting the maximum number of copies of a poset in a family F ⊆ 2 [n] that is P-free.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%