1993
DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(93)90106-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set inversion via interval analysis for nonlinear bounded-error estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
235
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
235
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here ε is the precision threshold (or the precision for short) of the SM-PE algorithm. The SIVIA (set inversion via interval analysis) algorithm (Jaulin and Walter, 1993) can be cited to exemplify the above principles (branch and bound (bisection) and interval analysis). The number of bisections to be performed is generally prohibitive.…”
Section: Jauberthie Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here ε is the precision threshold (or the precision for short) of the SM-PE algorithm. The SIVIA (set inversion via interval analysis) algorithm (Jaulin and Walter, 1993) can be cited to exemplify the above principles (branch and bound (bisection) and interval analysis). The number of bisections to be performed is generally prohibitive.…”
Section: Jauberthie Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved through constraint reasoning, where initial intervals, representing the uncertainty on parameter values, are safely narrowed by reliable interval methods. Nevertheless, the application of classical constraint approaches to nonlinear inverse problems [53,68] suffer from a major pitfall of considering the same likelihood for all values in the intervals.…”
Section: Nonlinear Inverse Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative constraint approach is known as bounded-error estimation or set membership estimation [53,68]. The idea is to replace the search for a single best-fit solution with the characterization of the set of all solutions consistent with acceptable measurement errors around the observations.…”
Section: Classical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Set Inversion (SI) (Jaulin and Walter, 1993), a well known paradigm of interval analysis, is well suited approximating solution sets of the form (2) by means of subpavings (sets of nonoverlapping boxes). The problem arises when these sets are of the form (3), because classical Set Inversion is not able to solve this type of problems in a direct way.…”
Section: Quantified Set Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%