2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2910778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set of Usability Heuristics for Quality Assessment of Mobile Applications on Smartphones

Abstract: The innovations proposed by the cell phone market have grown steadily in recent years, along with the increasing complexity of the hardware, operating systems, and applications available in this market. These changes bring new challenges related to usability that need to be considered during the development process of these applications since the new forms of user-application interactions increasingly require adapting the behavior of smartphone users. In this situation, usability is an important issue that dep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point, a preliminary usability evaluation was performed. To do so, a couple of usability methods were applied: The Keystroke-Level Model (also known as KLM) and a heuristic evaluation approach specifically designed for mobile devices (also referred to as Mobile Heuristic Evaluation), measuring efficiency and effectiveness; these attributes are seen in most mobile usability evaluations [62,63].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point, a preliminary usability evaluation was performed. To do so, a couple of usability methods were applied: The Keystroke-Level Model (also known as KLM) and a heuristic evaluation approach specifically designed for mobile devices (also referred to as Mobile Heuristic Evaluation), measuring efficiency and effectiveness; these attributes are seen in most mobile usability evaluations [62,63].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve the best possible result and to be able to search the existing publications we decided on the most popular search engines: Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. As summarized in Figure 4, we deeply detail the attributes and sub-attributes studied and selected in this paper, extracted from the best known and most often cited models in the literature [24][25][26][27][28][34][35][36][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Furthermore, we describe the selection procedure, the entry for each category and more information.…”
Section: Approach To Literature Review Entry Selection and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISO 9241-11:2018 [61], Nielsen [56,57], QUIM [35], PACMAD [26,47], GQM [48], MAUEM [27], Mortem Hertzum [49].…”
Section: Concept Evaluation Model and Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 In principle, usability and utility evaluation at all stages and as a continuous exercise during information system building is recommended. Traditionally analytical models 13 , 14 of the evaluation of usefulness of an information system involves inputs by subject matter professionals. Involving end-users for such evaluation, called empirical models, 13 is the user-centered approach for creating software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%