Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering
DOI: 10.1109/icde.1995.380413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set-oriented mining for association rules in relational databases

Abstract: We describe set-oriented algorithms for mining association rules. Such algorithms imply performing multiple joins and may appear to be inherently less escient than special-purpose algorithms. W e develop new algorithms that can be expressed as SQL queries, and discuss optimization of these algorithms. After analytical evaluation, an algorithm named S E T M emerges as the algorithm of choice. Algorithm S E T M uses only simple database primitives, viz., sorting and merge-scan join. Algorithm S E T M is simple, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
130
0
11

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
130
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Many algorithms have been proposed to solve this problem, from the original proposals, such as AIS (Agrawal, Imielinski, & Swami, 1993), SETM (Houtsma & Swami, 1993), and, in particular, Apriori (Agrawal & Srikant, 1994), to more advanced algorithms such as DHP (Park, Chen, & Yu, 1995), DIC (Brin et al, 1997), CARMA (Hidber, 1999), FP-Growth (Han, Pei, & Yin, 2000), and TBAR (Berzal et al, 2001). See Hipp, Güntzer, and Nakhaeizadeh (2000) for a recent survey of the problem and Han and Plank (1996) for a somewhat older comparison of some selected algorithms.…”
Section: Association Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many algorithms have been proposed to solve this problem, from the original proposals, such as AIS (Agrawal, Imielinski, & Swami, 1993), SETM (Houtsma & Swami, 1993), and, in particular, Apriori (Agrawal & Srikant, 1994), to more advanced algorithms such as DHP (Park, Chen, & Yu, 1995), DIC (Brin et al, 1997), CARMA (Hidber, 1999), FP-Growth (Han, Pei, & Yin, 2000), and TBAR (Berzal et al, 2001). See Hipp, Güntzer, and Nakhaeizadeh (2000) for a recent survey of the problem and Han and Plank (1996) for a somewhat older comparison of some selected algorithms.…”
Section: Association Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One disadvantage of the AIS algorithm is that it generates too many invalid candidate itemsets. Houtsma and Swami proposed the SETM algorithm [4] that uses SQL for generating the frequent itemsets. Although it uses standard SQL join operation for generating candidate itemsets, the SETM algorithm generates candidate itemsets through a process of iterations similar to that of the AIS algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Association Rules (Agrawal et al 1993;Houtsma, Swami 1995): focusing on two items (or more) of information and searching for connections between them. 3.…”
Section: Dm Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%