2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1874-575x(02)80026-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set Oriented Numerical Methods for Dynamical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
164
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We exploit these ideas in a numerical scheme by adapting set-oriented methods for the approximation of invariant sets [12,13]. For this we fix a certain time slice t 0 ∈ R, a small flow time T > 0, and a neighborhood of the saddle stagnation point strictly containing the ε-neighborhood of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We exploit these ideas in a numerical scheme by adapting set-oriented methods for the approximation of invariant sets [12,13]. For this we fix a certain time slice t 0 ∈ R, a small flow time T > 0, and a neighborhood of the saddle stagnation point strictly containing the ε-neighborhood of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By a valid initial condition we mean one whose trajectory satisfies the determinant and boundedness criteria in both forwards (i.e., on [t 0 , t 0 + T ]) and backwards ([t 0 − T, t 0 ]) time. For the selection step (ii) appropriate test point strategies are employed, which could also be made rigorous following the ideas of Dellnitz and Junge [13]. We alternate steps (i) and (ii) while increasing T until we have obtained a tight bound on the initial conditions that give rise to hyperbolic trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin with finding periodic points numerically. Since periodic points are of saddle type and hence are numerically unstable, we apply the subdivision algorithm [11] to find them. For each periodic orbit found numerically, we then construct a cubical index pair [17].…”
Section: Counting Periodic Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we describe our algorithm to prove quasi-hyperbolicity. The algorithm involves the subdivision algorithm [16], that is, if it fails to prove quasi-hyperbolicity, then it subdivides cubes in K and L to have a better approximation of the invariant set, and repeats the whole step until it succeeds with the proof. (1) Find K such that R(f λ ) ⊂ int K holds for all λ ∈ L, and let N : This theorem implies that if L contains a non-quasi-hyperbolic parameter value, then Algorithm 5.7 never stops.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%