1981
DOI: 10.1002/net.3230110206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set partitioning based heuristics for interactive routing

Abstract: --:: The set partitioning model is used as the basis for an interactive approach for solving a broad class of routing problems. A pricing mechanism is developed which can be used with a variety of methods in generating improving solutions. A version of the approach has been implemented via a colorgraphics display.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It offers the broad modeling flexibility inherent in set-covering formulations and is able to accommodate essentially arbitrarily complex routing constraints. Moreover, set-covering formulations are used frequently in many practical implementations of routing algorithms (see for example Balinsky and Quandt 1964, Ceria et al 1995, Cullen et al 1981, Desrochers et al 1992, so our results fit naturally within the current state of practice. Similarly, we are able to capture a wide array of distribution policies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Practical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It offers the broad modeling flexibility inherent in set-covering formulations and is able to accommodate essentially arbitrarily complex routing constraints. Moreover, set-covering formulations are used frequently in many practical implementations of routing algorithms (see for example Balinsky and Quandt 1964, Ceria et al 1995, Cullen et al 1981, Desrochers et al 1992, so our results fit naturally within the current state of practice. Similarly, we are able to capture a wide array of distribution policies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Practical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…These objectives refer to the minimization of user inconvenience. Although there exists an abundant body of literature on the DARP, a major part focuses exclusively on the minimization of routing costs based on the distance traveled by the different vehicles used [6,8,14,45]. In case, the objective of minimum user inconvenience is also treated, this is either done by applying it instead of the minimum cost objective or by means of a weighted sum objective function.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cullen, Jarvis and Ratliff [28] have proposed and tested a two-pronged heuristic combining a procedure similar to that just described with an approximate solution procedure for solving the set covering problem. The first phase solves an approximation to (11) with the cluster points chosen by a dispatcher or an analyst and with qiv set equal to the Euclidean distance between demand point i and cluster point v. After solving the generalized assignment problem t , though, the authors then redefine the location of each cluster point v so as to minimize the total distance from this point to all of the demand points assigned to it (this is convex optimization problem for each v).…”
Section: Optimization-based Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fisher and Jaikumar [43] have recently found that other approaches to solving the set covering problem can also be effective. Cullen, Jarvis and Ratliff [28] have also discovered that interactive heuristics stimulated by graphical display of tentative solutions can further enhance this solution approach. Another special network structure, the space-time diagram, emerges from scheduling considerations.…”
Section: Optimization-based Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%