1948
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-48-01560-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sets of complex numbers associated with a matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither Lemma 1 nor Lemma 2 holds over arbitrary fields. Lemma 1 does hold over the real field [4], but it is easy to construct examples to show that an algebraically closed field is not a superfluous assumption in Lemma 2. In particular Lemma 2 does not hold over the…”
Section: A Note On Matrix Solutions To a = Xy-yx Charles R Johnson1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither Lemma 1 nor Lemma 2 holds over arbitrary fields. Lemma 1 does hold over the real field [4], but it is easy to construct examples to show that an algebraically closed field is not a superfluous assumption in Lemma 2. In particular Lemma 2 does not hold over the…”
Section: A Note On Matrix Solutions To a = Xy-yx Charles R Johnson1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…,[4]. If Tr(A)=0, then A is unitarily equiralent to a matrix B=(bij) with bij=O, i=1, -*, n.C. R. JOHNSON[February LEMMA 2(FRIEDLAND [2]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let (u, v) be the unitary inner product and set f(z) = (Cz, z). The range of values of / for ||z|| =(z, z)1/2 = l is the field of values [1] of C and we denote it by F(C). Set A = (C+C*)/2, B = (C-C*)/2i, <b(z) = (Az, z), and f(z) = (Bz, z).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%