2011
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.579072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sets or frequencies? How to help people solve conditional probability problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the unit square is only predominant for subset relations that are not in line with the hierarchy of the tree diagram, we attribute this effect to the graphical transparency of the relevant subset relation and not to the area-proportionality. Therefore, we can argue that the measured effect is not due to a possible “frequentist reading” (Moro et al, 2011, p. 849) of the unit square.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, since the unit square is only predominant for subset relations that are not in line with the hierarchy of the tree diagram, we attribute this effect to the graphical transparency of the relevant subset relation and not to the area-proportionality. Therefore, we can argue that the measured effect is not due to a possible “frequentist reading” (Moro et al, 2011, p. 849) of the unit square.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, the results of the behavioural performances on the MHD show that when giving conditional feedback, the numerical representation of feedback is important. Previous research on the MHD (Aaron & Spivey-Knowlton, 1998;Krauss & Wang, 2003;Tubau, 2008) and other conditional probability problems (e.g., Gigerenzer, 1991Gigerenzer, , 1994Gigerenzer & Hoffrage, 1995;Moro et al, 2011) have shown that participants perform better when the problems are presented in frequencies rather than in percentages or proportions. In our study, we did not replicate this overall superiority of the frequency manipulation as such.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This latter manipulation is based on research indicating that people perform better on conditional probability problems when the problem is stated in frequencies rather than in percentages or probabilities (e.g., Gigerenzer, 1991Gigerenzer, , 1994Gigerenzer & Hoffrage, 1995;Moro, Bodanza, & Freidin, 2011). As already mentioned above, this has also been demonstrated for the MHD by the research of Aaron and SpiveyKnowlton (1998), Krauss and Wang (2003), and Tubau (2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We used a numerical and graphical pictorial format of the problems, expressed by frequencies, referring to classic works in the literature on this topic Girotto & Gonzalez, 2001;Moro et al, 2011).…”
Section: Probabilistic Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%