2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting energy justice apart from the crowd: Lessons from environmental and climate justice

Abstract: The continuation and exacerbation of many environmental failures illustrate that environmental and climate justice's influence on decision-making is not being systematically effective, giving rise to a renewed emphasis on finding new, more focused, justice models. This includes the energy justice concept, which has received ready and growing success. Yet for energy justice, a key question keeps arising: what does it add that environmental and climate justice cannot? To answer this question this perspective out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
113
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy justice concept specifies the multifaceted themes covered by environmental and climate justice on the consumption and production of energy services (Bickerstaff, Walker, and Bulkeley 2013;Jenkins 2018). Although energy justice is based on the same philosophical groundings as well as analytical perspectives of distribution, procedure and recognitionwhich I will explain in the following linesit stands out for its "nonactivist past" (Heffron, McCauley, and Sovacool 2015;Jenkins et al 2016) and high diversity of methods used (i.e.…”
Section: Theoretical Background 31 Energy Justice Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy justice concept specifies the multifaceted themes covered by environmental and climate justice on the consumption and production of energy services (Bickerstaff, Walker, and Bulkeley 2013;Jenkins 2018). Although energy justice is based on the same philosophical groundings as well as analytical perspectives of distribution, procedure and recognitionwhich I will explain in the following linesit stands out for its "nonactivist past" (Heffron, McCauley, and Sovacool 2015;Jenkins et al 2016) and high diversity of methods used (i.e.…”
Section: Theoretical Background 31 Energy Justice Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McCauley, and Forman 2017) which increases the likelihood to be applied for energy policy formulation and decision-making processes (Jenkins 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Background 31 Energy Justice Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although stemming from both the environmental and climate justice movements and based in similar frameworks, energy justice is distinct from its predecessors (Jenkins, 2018). Whereas environmental justice and climate justice both document and analyze a vast array of sources of injustices, the field of energy justice is narrower in scope and focuses on the disproportionate impacts that result from each stage of the energy system (Fuller & McCauley, 2016), from energy production (see e.g., Goedkoop & Devine-Wright, 2016;Heffron & McCauley, 2014;Simpson & Clifton, 2016) through consumption (see e.g., Chatterton, Anable, Barnes, & Yeboah, 2016;Hall, 2013;Simcock, 2016;Walker, Simcock, & Day, 2016).…”
Section: Foundations Of Environmental Energy and Climate Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, at the same time, a conceptual tool that integrates distributive, procedural, cosmopolitan, and recognition justice; an analytical tool helpful to reframe energy problems; and a decision-making tool for planers and consumers. Scholars of energy justice argue that it is more strategically impactful than EJ and climate justice-concepts upon which it is built-for three main reasons (Jenkins, 2018). First, energy justice "provides a way of "bounding" and separating out energy concerns from the wider range of topics addressed within both environmental and climate justice campaigning" (Bickerstaff et al, 2013, p. 2).…”
Section: Energy Justice Vs Energy Democracy: What Is In a Word?mentioning
confidence: 99%